Laserfiche WebLink
for Mountain House and State law (Government Code Section 65458). <br /> REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION: <br /> When the Specific Plan Reimbursement Fees were adopted, the cost of administering them was <br /> not included in the fee amounts. At that time, it was anticipated that this cost would be included as <br /> part of the County Development Monitoring Fee for Mountain House. After further evaluation, the <br /> Community Development Department has concluded that this cost should more appropriately be <br /> included as a part of the Specific Plan Reimbursement Fees. This would be consistent with other <br /> impact fees that have been adopted for Mountain House (e.g., Community Facilities Fees for <br /> parks, libraries, and public safety and administrative facilities; the Transportation Improvement <br /> Fee (TIF)for transportation improvements within Mountain House; and the Traffic Impact <br /> Mitigation Fee Program (TIMF) for regional transportation improvements impacted by Mountain <br /> House). <br /> Staff is also recommending that the Mountain House Master Specific Plan Fee be revised to <br /> reflect costs incurred by Trimark for tasks specified in Scope of Work No. 9 for the period <br /> February 1, 2001 through June 30, 2001. These tasks, undertaken by County staff, are <br /> reimbursable expenses under State law. (Included in these tasks are the following: general <br /> administration; development of application forms for Mountain House projects; preparation of a <br /> Mountain House application fee schedule; development of Mountain House application review <br /> procedures; revisions to the Specific Plan Reimbursement Fee Ordinance and Resolution; <br /> development of procedures for the mitigation monitoring program and the community monitoring <br /> program for Mountain House; and modifications to community plans and programs.) <br /> Adoption of the proposed Ordinance and the amended Resolution would mean that the Specific <br /> Plan Reimbursement Fees would now include a 5% surcharge to cover the Community ' <br /> Development Department's administrative cost. In addition, the Mountain House Master Specific <br /> Plan Reimbursement Fee would include an additional $60,519.48 in reimbursable costs. This <br /> would increase the total Mountain House Master Specific Plan Reimbursement Fee from $934 per <br /> acre as originally adopted to$1091 per acre, and the Mountain House Specific Plan I <br /> Reimbursement Fee from $807 per acre as originally adopted to$930 per acre. (Note: The <br /> original fee amounts have been adjusted to June 2001 based on changes in the Consumer Price <br /> Index. This adjustment resulted in a base fee of$1,039 for the Mountain House Master Specific <br /> Plan Reimbursement Fee, and a base fee of$886 for the Mountain House Specific Plan I <br /> Reimbursement Fee. To obtain the total fee, $52 per acre was added to the Mountain House <br /> Master Specific Plan Reimbursement Fee and.$44 per acre was added to the Specific Plan I <br /> Reimbursement Fee, to reflect the 5% surcharge.) <br /> Trimark Communities has reviewed the proposed Ordinance and the amended Resolution and <br /> has not expressed any objections to them. <br /> CEQA ANALYSIS: <br /> An ordinance/resolution that authorizes and establishes an administrative fee component for a <br /> specified fee is exempt from CEQA (Section 15273, Article 18, Title 14 of the California Code of <br /> Regulations), provided certain conditions are met. To obtain the exemption for the proposed <br /> Ordinance and amended Resolution, the Board of Supervisors needs to make the following <br /> finding: <br /> I <br /> The Ordinance and amended Resolution are necessary for the purpose of meeting the <br /> operating expenses, including employee wage rates and fringe benefits, of the <br /> Community Development Department in administering the Mountain House Master <br /> Specific Plan Reimbursement Fee and the Mountain House Specific Plan I <br /> Reimbursement Fee. <br /> 2 <br />