Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNTAIN HOUSE NEIGHBORHOOD' 'PROJECT INITIAL STUDY <br /> P. AESTHETICS <br /> The proposed project would ultimately result in the buildout of 978 new single-family lots, four lots of <br /> high density residential development, new commercial and industrial development, new roads and the <br /> development of parks and open space. New buildings would range in height from 25 feet to 45 feet and <br /> would be most visible from nearby public roads such as Grant Line Road, Byron Road, and Mountain <br /> House Parkway. Views of new development would also be visible from proposed collectors and arterials <br /> that do not currently exist. New development could generate light and glare in an area that is currently <br /> undeveloped and in primarily agricultural use. <br /> A Roadway Landscape Plan was prepared in October 1999 by David Gates& Associates was adopted by <br /> the Community Services District(CSD)Board of Directors, and can be viewed at the San Joaquin County <br /> Community Development Department. This plan includes conceptual illustrations of tree, shrub, and <br /> groundcover plantings along Mountain House Parkway, DeAnza Boulevard, Central Parkway, Mountain <br /> House Boulevard, Mascot Boulevard, a typical arterial intersection, a typical neighborhood entry, the <br /> Wicklund Crossing, a residential collector, local street, Legacy Lane, and the Neighborhood"F"Park. <br /> However, the Roadway Landscape Plan does not identify how the recommendations will be used, by <br /> whom, or at what stage of the development process. In addition, the Plan states that the design and plant <br /> species shown are subject to modification at subsequent detailed design and construction documentation <br /> preparation. The CSD Design Manual(discussed below)provides implementation for the Roadway <br /> Landscape Plan. <br /> In addition, the CSD has adopted Mountain House Community Services District Design Review Manual <br /> (adopted by CSD Board of Directors)which addresses the following: streetscapes, walls and fences; <br /> paths; street furniture;lighting; signage; entries; community edges;parks; schools; civic facilities; and <br /> public works facilities. A Preliminary Street Lighting Plan was submitted with the Tentative Map <br /> application. A map has also been prepared to identify locations of proposed soundwalls. These walls are <br /> addressed in more detail in Section H of the Initial Study. <br /> After approval of the Final Subdivision Map, the design review process would include review by the CSD <br /> for all community facilities and buildings(except those services provided by other responsible agencies <br /> such as schools). The CSD is to review design and improvement plans for new CSD facilities within the <br /> community for conformance with the CSD Design Manual and with all applicable Master Plan programs, <br /> policies, standards, and applicable Master Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions(CC&Rs). Design <br /> Guidelines will be required to be submitted for approval prior to approval of the Final Subdivision Map <br /> for Neighborhood"F". The CSD Design Manual outlines the design review process which includes both <br /> a preliminary design review session with CSD staff and final design approval by the CSD Board of <br /> Directors for community facilities. <br /> Individual home designs would not be subject to CSD approval. However, the County has adopted an <br /> ordinance to amend the Development Title to require a Mountain House Design Review Consistency <br /> Review Committee. This Committee would review all development permit applications, including private <br /> development, to ensure consistency with all applicable design-related policies,plans, and ordinances. <br /> C:UoesslcVNrruL snmMNALINmALMMY-PARTIDOC(7/20/00) 118 V.P. AESTHETICS <br />