Laserfiche WebLink
Phelan Development Holly Master Plan - Buildings H & 1 <br /> 15188.000.006 Geotechnical Exploration <br /> on October 21, 2021, CPTs on October 22, 2021, and test pits on November 4, 2021. The <br /> exploration locations shown on the Site Plan (Figure 2) are approximate and were estimated by <br /> utilizing smart phones with GPS and Google Earth; they should be considered accurate only to <br /> the degree implied by the method used. <br /> 2.1.1 Borings <br /> We observed drilling of two borings at the locations shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. An ENGEO <br /> representative observed the drilling and logged the subsurface conditions at each location. We <br /> retained a truck-mounted Mobile B53 drill rig and crew to advance the borings using <br /> 4-inch-diameter solid-flight auger methods. The borings were advanced to a maximum depth of <br /> 31'/2 feet below existing grade. <br /> We obtained soil samples at various intervals in the borings using either a 3-inch O.D. <br /> California-type split-spoon sampler fitted with 6-inch-long steel liners or a 2-inch O.D. Standard <br /> Penetration Test (SPT) split-spoon sampler. <br /> The standard penetration resistance blow counts were obtained by dropping a 140-pound <br /> hammer through a 30-inch free fall. The 2-inch O.D. split-spoon sampler was driven 18 inches <br /> and the number of blows was recorded for each 6 inches of penetration. In addition, 2.5-inch I.D. <br /> samples were obtained using a Modified California Sampler driven into the soil with the 140-pound <br /> hammer previously described. Unless otherwise indicated, the blows per foot recorded on the <br /> boring log represent the accumulated number of blows to drive the last 1-foot of penetration; the <br /> blow counts have not been converted using any correction factors. When sampler driving was <br /> difficult, penetration was recorded only as inches penetrated for 50 hammer blows. <br /> We used the field logs to develop the report logs in Appendix A. The logs depict subsurface <br /> conditions at the exploration locations for the date of exploration; however, subsurface conditions <br /> may vary with time. <br /> 2.1.2 Cone Penetration Tests <br /> We retained a CPT rig to push the cone penetrometer to a maximum depth of about 93 feet. The <br /> CPT has a 20-ton compression-type cone with a 15-square-centimeter (cm2) base area, an apex <br /> angle of 60 degrees, and a friction sleeve with a surface area of 225 cm2. The cone, connected <br /> with a series of rods, is pushed into the ground at a constant rate. Cone readings are taken at <br /> approximately 5-cm intervals with a penetration rate of 2 cm per second in accordance with ASTM <br /> D-5778. Measurements include the tip resistance to penetration of the cone (Qc), the resistance <br /> of the surface sleeve (Fs), and pore pressure (U) (Robertson and Campanella, 1988). CPT logs <br /> are presented in Appendix C. <br /> 2.1.3 Test Pits <br /> We observed the excavation of 12 test pits at the locations shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. An <br /> ENGEO representative observed the test pit excavation and logged the subsurface conditions at <br /> each location.We retained a rubber-wheeled backhoe to excavate the test pits using a 3-foot-wide <br /> bucket and logged the type, location, and uniformity of the underlying soil. The maximum depth <br /> excavated in the test pits was 16 feet. Test pits were marked with caution tape before loosely <br /> backfilling with excavated material; locations should be excavated during site grading operations <br /> and replaced as engineered fill. <br /> ENGEO December 13, 2021 <br /> Expect Exceltence <br />