Laserfiche WebLink
Neutniller & Beardslee <br /> A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION <br /> ROBERT L.BEAROSLEE JAMES D.SELLARS ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS 1873-1933 L. NEUMILLER <br /> THOMAS J.SHEPHARD FRANK E.AUSTIN 1873-1933 <br /> DUNCAN R.MCPHERSON TIMOTHY H.B.YARYAN <br /> RUDY V.BILAWSKI RALPH C.OGDEN III 400 FIRST FEDERAL PLAZA BUILDING GEORGE A. DITZ <br /> ROBERT C.MORRISON MARC H.GREENBERG 6 SOUTH ELDORADO STREET 1809-1971 <br /> JAMES R.DYKE STEVEN A.HERUM IRVING L. NEUMILLER <br /> JAMES A.ASK--W P. O. DRAWER 20 LESLEY D.HOLLAND 1899-1970 <br /> JOHN W.STOVALL CRAIG W.HUNTER STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA 95201 <br /> DONALD W.WEST ROBERT J.KAHN <br /> (209) 948-8200 at z <br /> May 5 , 1982 <br /> NIAY 6 1982 9 <br /> SAN JOAQUIN LOCAL HEALTH DIST; <br /> THE HONORABLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH { I , <br /> County of San Joaquin <br /> Courthouse - Room 701 <br /> Stockton, California 95202 <br /> Re: Report on Austin Road Disposal Site <br /> Our file 28960-07212 <br /> Honorable Supervisors: <br /> On March 4, 1982 , you received a report, from the office <br /> of County Counsel, on the operation of the Forward, Inc. <br /> Austin Road Resource Recovery Center and Class II-1 Disposal <br /> Site. By Board motion B-82-461, you set May 6, 1982 at 1: 30 <br /> for public comment on that report. <br /> This letter is the written comment of Forward, Inc. to <br /> that report. We reserve the right to submit additional <br /> responses to comments submitted by others if appropriate. <br /> The County staff report is thorough and accurate. The <br /> major conclusions of that report are that Forward' s operation <br /> is (a) heavily regulated by numerous state and local agencies, <br /> (b) under five specific permits, and (c) is in substantial 1) <br /> compliance with all the laws and permit terms and conditions. <br /> All agencies reporting to the County staff reported the <br /> operation to be in compliance, except that the State Department <br /> of Health Services, which had conducted an on-site inspection <br /> on February 24, 1982, had not then completed its report. <br /> That report has now been completed; copies were sent to <br /> the County Counsel. It lists some minor deficiencies, and <br /> concludes as follows: "Overall, the facility appears to be <br /> a good operation with no significant problems. " In other <br /> words, the operation is in compliance. All agencies thus <br /> reporting show the operation to be in compliance. <br /> In short, Forward, Inc. , at Austin Road, is conducting a <br /> business, which is heavily regulated by state and local <br /> agencies, which is operating under arp oper County use <br /> e� rmit, and which is complying with all laws and permits. <br />