My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_1982-1983
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
CORRESPONDENCE_1982-1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2023 4:12:38 PM
Creation date
10/6/2022 3:15:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1982-1983
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
626
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
On the other-hand, the soil solution does strongly resemble the <br /> chemical composition of oil well brines that I have encountered. Viz, <br /> high chlorides and sodium. Even the low concentrations of bromide seem <br /> to be typical of connate brines. <br /> You will note, of course that stoichiometrically, there is more <br /> chloride than sodium in the soil solution. (40 Me/l of chloride vs 35 Me/1 <br /> of sodium.) This is to be expected, due to base exchange phenomena, <br /> much the same as a water softener being recharged with a brine. <br /> Turning now to the total dissolved solids in the soil solution, <br /> if we multiply the specific conductance by two, we will have an estimate <br /> of the specific conductance of the soil solution. Taking the case of the <br /> sample of soil from the 8' to 10' depth, we have: <br /> 2 x 3710 limhos=7420 pmhos estimated to be the specific conductance of the <br /> soil solution beneath the ponds. <br /> A conversion factor that is sometimes used to estimate total dissolved <br /> solids from specific conductance is as follows: <br /> .7 x specific conductance (in u os)= TDS in mg/1. <br /> Using this conversion factor, the TDS in the soil solution beneath <br /> the ponds at the 8'-10' depth is as follows <br /> .7 x 7420= 5194 mg/1 total dissolved solids <br /> It is my understanding that Forward, Inc. analyzed the brine in the <br /> ponds this year and the analysis showed the brine to be about 5000 mg/1 <br /> total dissolved solids. This fits very nicely with the findings described <br /> above. <br /> How much brine has leaked from the ponds? The analyses strongly <br /> suggest that the "wetting front" of the brine has gone beyond the 10' <br /> depth. In this kind of a soil, it will have taken about 30" of brine <br /> to have accomplished that kind of penetration. If the ponds leaked this <br /> much throughout their entire area, the leakage would amount to more than <br /> 1.8 million gallons. <br /> In summation, the soil sample analyses indicate that the brine j <br /> leaking from the ponds has soaked at least 10 feet beneath the pond <br /> bottoms. It is now merely a matter of time until this brine reaches <br /> the water supply of San Joaquin citizens. Scientific estimates can <br /> be made of how much water had to leak through the pond bottom to have <br /> seeped to the depth of ten feet, and the indications are that the <br /> amount of leakage is considerable, but the seepage may have penetrated <br /> far beyond that depth. <br /> Yo r truly, <br /> { <br /> Dwig C. Baier, P. E. , CPAg/SS <br /> President <br /> DCB:bb <br /> CC: Richard W. Konig <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.