Laserfiche WebLink
Site Investigation Work Plan Data Acquisition <br /> Carousel Cleaners, Sacramento, California and QA/QC <br /> 5.0 Data Acquisition and Quality Assurance/Quality Control <br /> This section discusses the procedures, objectives, functional activities, and specific QA/QC activities <br /> designed to achieve established data quality goals, for all quality-related field sampling and laboratory <br /> analysis activities to be implemented during investigation activities. The measures will be implemented to <br /> produce data that are scientifically valid,be of known and acceptable quality,meet established objectives, <br /> and be legally defensible through the assessment of precision, accuracy,representativeness, <br /> comparability, and completeness(PARCC). <br /> 5.1 Project Design and Rationale <br /> The CVWB has initiated this investigation to assess the nature and extent of VOC contamination in the <br /> project vicinity. All samples will be analyzed for select VOCs, specifically PCE and its daughter <br /> products, at a minimum. <br /> 5.2 Data Quality Objectives <br /> Data quality objectives(DQOs) are used to develop a scientific and resource-effective data collection <br /> design. DQOs should ensure that the data collected will meet the qualitative and quantitative goals of the <br /> project. The DQOs are based on the Guidance on Systematic Planning Using the Data Quality Objectives <br /> Process(USEPA 2006). The DQO process consists of the following seven steps: <br /> 1. State the Problem <br /> 2. Identify the Goal of the Study <br /> 3. Identify Information Inputs <br /> 4. Define the Boundaries of the Study <br /> 5. Develop the Analytic Approach <br /> 6. Specify Performance or Acceptance Criteria <br /> 7. Develop the Analytic Approach <br /> 5.3 Statistical Parameter Indicators <br /> Specific QA indicators will be established for each of the PARCC data assessment parameters. These <br /> acceptance limits will be expressed as quantitative and qualitative statements concerning the type of data <br /> needed to support a decision,based on a specified level of uncertainty. Table 3 lists acceptance criteria for <br /> precision, accuracy, and completeness for USEPA Methods TO-15 and TO-15 SIM. <br /> 5.3.1 Precision <br /> Precision is a measure of mutual agreement among replicate(duplicate) or co-located sample <br /> measurements of the same analyte within the same method and matrix. The closer that the numerical <br /> values of the measurements are to each other,the more precise the measurement. Precision for a single <br /> analyte will be expressed as the relative percent difference(RPD)between the results of any duplicates. <br /> Field duplicate(FD) samples will be collected and analyzed at a frequency of approximately 10 percent. <br /> Precision also will be assessed for laboratory control samples and sample duplicates (LCSs/LCSDs). <br /> 5-1 <br />