My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_2000-2002
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
CORRESPONDENCE_2000-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2023 4:14:05 PM
Creation date
10/21/2022 10:00:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2000-2002
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
500
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Austin Road Landfill -3- 23 May 2000 <br /> Inspection Report <br /> Additional miscellaneous issues were identified <br /> during the inspection. Copies of the NPDES <br /> permit and Air Pollution Control District operation <br /> permit were not present on-site during the <br /> inspection. Three empty 55-gallon drums and <br /> waste sample tubing are stored within the <br /> treatment compound. Water leakage from the base <br /> of the air stripper was observed; however, the <br /> source of the leak could not be identified. The <br /> emergency eyewash station was empty and non- <br /> functional_ <br /> Non-operational eye wash station. <br /> INSPECTION OF RECEIVING WATERS: <br /> I inspected the receiving water sample locations, R I and R2. I was unable to determine the exact <br /> location where the Discharger collects receiving water samples; however, determined the approximate <br /> locations from description and map within the Order. The upstream receiving water location (R1) was <br /> turbid with limited algal growth. The turbidity at this sample location made it difficult to discern <br /> bottom deposits or life forms. The downstream receiving water location R2 was fairly clear, and <br /> supported filamentous algae, water insects, and freshwater invertebrates. An otter was observed <br /> approximately 200 feet downstream from the discharge outfall. The flow at R2 appears to be <br /> approximately twice that observed at R1. _ <br /> $111 t <br /> Upstream receiving water sample location R1, located Downstream receiving water sample location R2, <br /> roughly 100 feet upstream from discharge point. There located roughly 1000 feet downstream from point of <br /> is minimal flow and high turbidity noted with this water. discharge. Filamentous algae, water bugs and <br /> invertebrates are prevalent at this sample location. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.