Laserfiche WebLink
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Investigation Report <br />206 Sutter Street, Stockton, California <br />Page 5 <br />1980s infiltrated to depths of 80-100 feet bgs and the soil contaminant plumes were subsequently drowned. <br />These historic drowned plumes have complicated remediation efforts throughout Stockton. <br />On September 22 and 23, 2022, Condor advanced a total of five (5) borings at the Site. DP-1 soil boring <br />was advanced to 60 feet bgs, DP-3 and DP-6 soil borings were advanced to 35 feet bgs, and DP-4 and DP- <br />7 soil borings were advanced to 45 feet bgs. A total of seven (7) soil samples and five (5) groundwater <br />samples were collected and analyzed for TPH-G, TPH-D, and TPH-MO and VOCs. <br />In the western portion of the Site, elevated concentrations of TPH-D, TPH-G, and TPH-D were detected in <br />groundwater samples DP-1 located in the southwest corner of the Site with lighter than water immiscible <br />sheen or product present, as well as the highest detected benzene concentration at 25 µg/L, which is above <br />the MCL of 1.0 µg/L. Naphthalene was detected at 24 µg/L in DP-1 which is above the California Division <br />of Water’s CNL of 17 µg/L. TPH-D and TPH-G were detected at 260 µg/L and 110 µg/L, respectively in <br />groundwater samples collected at DP-4 and TPH-D was detected at 170 µg/L in DP-6. Benzene was <br />detected at 1.3 µg/L in DP-4, which is slightly above the MCL of 1.0 µg/L. <br />Analytical results from soil samples collected from DP-1 at 35 feet bgs indicate elevated concentrations of <br />TPH-D, TPH-G, and TPH-MO at 8,000 mg/kg, which is above the EPA RSL for industrial soil of 560 <br />mg/kg, 20,000 mg/kg, and 540 mg/kg, which is also above the US EPA RSL for industrial soil, respectively. <br />TPH-D and TPH-MO concentrations significantly decrease at 45 feet bgs. TPH-G decreases to 330 mg/kg <br />in the soil sample collected at 45 feet bgs and 3.3 mg/kg at 55 feet bgs. PID readings collected during soil <br />sampling at DP-1 indicated measured concentrations of 15 ppm at 10 feet bgs; 5.0 ppm and lower from 15- <br />30 feet bgs; from 50 ppm to approximately 200 ppm at 30-45 feet bgs; and from 5 ppm to 13 ppm at 45-60 <br />feet bgs with the associated dark blue color staining. Petroleum odors were observed by field personnel in <br />the field with samples associated with elevated PID readings. <br />In the eastern portion of the Site, no contamination was observed or documented with the exception of <br />TPH-MO in the groundwater sample collected at DP-7, which was detected at 510 µg/L, just above the <br />laboratory reporting limit of 500 µg/L. No staining was observed and the PID measured 0.0 ppm throughout <br />the entire boring. <br />6.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMENDATIONS <br />Soil and groundwater contamination appears to be confined in the southwest and western portions of the <br />Site where the historic fueling station was located prior to construction and demolition of the Ambassador <br />Hotel with at least 20 feet of separation between the ground surface and the contamination plume in the <br />subsurface. Shallow groundwater in Stockton is not used for public consumption or use; therefore, it is <br />Condor’s opinion that the contamination plume does not pose a material risk to human health at the Site <br />and does not likely pose a vapor encroachment concern for the Site. <br />As a result, it is Condor’s opinion that the planned construction of a parking lot is the best land use for <br />redevelopment of the Site. Condor recommends the development of a groundwater monitoring well <br />network to obtain groundwater quality data over four (4) consecutive quarters to confirm concentrations <br />as well as the extent of the past release in the direction of groundwater flow (northeast). <br />7.0 LIMITATIONS <br />The scope of work for this report is intended to provide a limited review of certain information related <br />to the potential presence of contamination at or beneath the Site. This report is not intended to eliminate <br />all risk of the subject property bearing some degree of environmental liability. Condor cannot and will <br />not warrant or certify that the Site is free of contaminants because it is impossible to know if such a <br />condition