Laserfiche WebLink
Potentially Less Than Less Than Analyzed <br /> Si nificant Significant with Si nificant No In The <br /> 9 Mitigation 9 <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Prior EIR <br /> XII. MINERAL RESOURCES. <br /> Would the project: <br /> a) Result in the loss of availability of a known_mineral <br /> resource that would be of value to the region and the <br /> residents of the state? <br /> b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important <br /> mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local <br /> general plan,specific plan or other land use plan? El El M El El <br /> Impact Discussion: <br /> a, b) This project has two components.The first is a General Plan designation change from VT(Truck Terminal)to A/G <br /> (General Agriculture).The second is a Conditional Use Permit Application for an agricultural processing facility(Use <br /> Type: Industry-Agricultural) to include the construction of a 96,959 square foot two-story building. San Joaquin <br /> County applies a mineral resource zone (MRZ) designation to land that meets the significant mineral deposits <br /> definition by the State Division of Mines and Geology.The project site is not located in a Mineral Resource Zone, <br /> there is currently no mining activity in the area, and the surrounding area is developed with industrial, agricultural <br /> and residential uses. Therefore, the proposed project will not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral <br /> resources because the site does not contain minerals of significance or known mineral resources. Therefore,the <br /> proposed project applications will have less than a significant impact on the availability of mineral resources or <br /> mineral resource recovery sites within San Joaquin County. <br /> 18 <br /> Planning Commission Staff Report, PA-2100295 (GP, SA) 21 <br /> Environmental Review <br />