Laserfiche WebLink
Toxicity <br />In an email dated January 27, the County inquired about the toxicity of the process <br />water. On February 3, Simplot replied, stating that historical sampling of the process <br />water in the North Pond (the source of the January spill) indicates elevated ammonia as <br />nitrogen, nitrate as nitrogen, sulfate, and TDS. These constituents are not listed in <br />Appendix X (22 OCR Div. 4.5, Ch. 11, App. X) as chemicals that create a presumption <br />that a waste is hazardous waste. <br />Typical water quality of process water in the lined ponds can be found in Simplot's <br />Waste Discharge Requirements for Class ll Surface Impoundments, Order R5-2019- <br />0010. <br />The excavated solids have not been characterized beyond the data provided, which <br />includes total metals (CAM 17), VOCs, pH, and TPH (TPH for offsite portion of May <br />2021 spill event only). <br />Waste Characterization <br />While it is expected to find trace metals in the process water due to the potential for <br />trace metal content from raw materials used in our processes, there is no further <br />introduction of metals in the process. Since the water is recycled in the process, it is not <br />considered a waste and as such, waste analysis (such as STLC or TCLP) is not <br />conducted. However, in the rare cases of a process water spill, the waste (composed of <br />a mixture of the process water and backfill/soil materials), is characterized using a total <br />metals analysis confirming generator knowledge regarding toxicity from metals in the <br />process water. None of the total metals results exceeded "20X the TCLP limit" for <br />RCRA hazardous waste characterization (D Code listing); therefore, TCLP analysis, <br />which would determine if a toxicity characteristic for the RCRA 8 metals was applicable, <br />was not conducted. Similarly, the results from a TTLC analysis are used to determine if <br />an STLC test is required. In the laboratory report, no STLC analyses were "triggered" or <br />recommended by the lab (see results table footnotes). <br />Due to the likely presence of fertilizer constituents, the waste was disposed of as Non- <br />RCRA Hazardous. <br />Summary <br />The excavation efforts on this spill response were conservative (high solids to spill ratio, <br />as noted above; disposed of as Non-RCRA Hazardous) and coordinated with the <br />County. All follow-up information was provided as requested, including waste <br />characterization lab results and pH readings of soils left in place. Simplot will provide <br />copies of the hazardous waste manifests/disposal records (soils were transported on <br />April 18) to the County when received. Simplot is confident that this spill was addressed <br />adequately. For future spills, Simplot will request that the County approve of excavation <br />efforts shortly after the excavation is completed. <br />Sincerely, <br />1.41rldryllvvirvirvilrJr.L.A.4.4.41,4r 4.41,49,11riv4r4wiri. irvarimir.41,14,4•47,41. irmirvar