Laserfiche WebLink
_ report <br /> �..,._rvuNERATOR DESCRIPTION OF FOLLOW-eP ACTIOnce issues from Section 3. <br /> Number the follow up actions to correspond to app p <br /> riaffNameof <br /> /OPERATOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INSPECTION RESULTS <br /> wed the results of the designated UST operator inspection report and provided a <br /> of the action(s)taken or to be taken to correct any compliance issues discovered. <br /> T Owner/ Operator(print) <br /> UST Owner/Operator Signature Date Signed <br /> 7. INSPECTION HISTORY <br /> Has each follow-up action of Section 3 from the previous Designated UST Yes No NA <br /> Operator Inspection Report been completed appropriately? <br /> Attach documentation verif ing appropriate service to this re ort. <br /> 8. RELEASE DETECTION ALARM HISTORY <br /> Attach a copy of the alarm history report/log to this report. <br /> Yes No NA <br /> Is the monitoring system powered on and in proper operating mode? `❑ <br /> HasFall <br /> larm since the previous inspection been responded to appropriately? ❑ <br /> (Attumentation verifying appropriate service to this report.) ❑ <br /> Havntainment sumps, that have had an alarm since the previousdesi UST operator inspection report, been responded to by a qualified <br /> service technician? <br /> All answers marked "No"must be described by the designated UST operator in Section 3. <br /> Page 2of4 <br />