Laserfiche WebLink
California Water Today 115 <br /> of political clout.Critics of the Department of Water Resources express concern <br /> that the agency's broader public mission of statewide water resource planning <br /> conflicts with (and is compromised by) its operation of the State Water Project <br /> (Little Hoover Commission 2010). In Chapter 8, we suggest some institutional <br /> reforms to improve the performance of these state agencies. <br /> Federal agencies also face resource constraints, exacerbating the effects of <br /> diminished federal involvement in California water in recent decades(Chapter 1). <br /> In particular,the ability of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to play a major <br /> role in California has been severely taxed by American involvement in wars and <br /> reconstruction in Iraq and Afghanistan,as well as the need to focus domestic <br /> efforts on the Gulf of Mexico in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina and the <br /> British Petroleum oil spill. <br /> The courts <br /> California's judicial system also plays an important role in water governance, <br /> with the courts serving as arbiters of disputes over particular water manage- <br /> ment and use issues that often affect or reflect broader policies. State courts, <br /> rather than the legislature,established the initial contours of California's hybrid <br /> system of water rights, and courts continue to define and redefine those con- <br /> tours (such as the meaning of"reasonable use") (Gray 2004). In the absence <br /> of state groundwater permitting, courts have been the locus of adjudication <br /> proceedings for groundwater basins. Federal and state courts also have had a <br /> central role in environmental policy. In recent years, court actions have been <br /> particularly important in protecting environmental flows and other environ- <br /> mental amenities of water, both through the judicially enforced public trust <br /> doctrine(National Audubon Society v. Superior Court 1983)and through their <br /> interpretation and enforcement of the federal and state Endangered Species <br /> Acts (Moore, Mulville, and Weinberg 1996; Doremus and Tarlock 2003). For <br /> instance,current controversies over water supply and endangered species man- <br /> agement in the Delta are largely being played out in a federal court in Fresno <br /> (Chapter 1). The threat of a court decision can also lead parties to come to <br /> a settlement—the case with the recent agreement to restore flows to the San <br /> Joaquin River to bring back salmon and other fish species (Box 9.1). <br /> A Diverse Mix of Other Actors <br /> Many other groups, both formal and informal, are involved in making and <br /> implementing water policies and managing water resources. <br />