Laserfiche WebLink
122 Part I California Water <br /> a broad public purpose may now be considered taxes, subject to a two-thirds <br /> vote of the state legislature(up from a simple majority).Local governing bodies, <br /> which could approve these fees without a vote of the general public, would <br /> also be required to seek a two-thirds vote of the general public for such fees. <br /> Although the text of the new amendment is uncertain in some respects and will <br /> certainly be tested in litigation,Proposition 26 is likely to substantially restrict <br /> California's ability to address the current gaps in resources for broad public <br /> purposes,including environmental stewardship and water resources planning. <br /> Is There Enough Money to Pay for California's Water System? <br /> Restrictions on state and local funding,along with the budget woes of federal <br /> and state governments,naturally raise the question of whether California can <br /> maintain, let alone enhance, its current water operations and infrastructure. <br /> Water managers in all sectors tend to answer with a resounding"no."But the <br /> answer is more nuanced than is commonly believed, reflecting the roles and <br /> responsibilities of different levels of government in water system management <br /> and differences in funding rules. <br /> Utilities <br /> Urban water and wastewater utilities,which are responsible for the vast major- <br /> ity of spending on water supply and wastewater infrastructure and operations, <br /> appear to be in relatively good financial shape.Every four years,these utilities are <br /> required to submit estimates of their long-term capital needs to the EPA,which <br /> tracks investment needs nationwide.The most recent assessments,from 2007 for <br /> water and from 2008 for wastewater,indicate that California's 20-year spending <br /> needs for publicly owned utilities are on the order of$40.7 billion and$24.4 bil- <br /> lion (2008 $), respectively, or roughly$2 billion and $1.2 billion per year.55 An <br /> additional estimated$3.9 billion over 20 years($194 million per year)is needed <br /> for managing stormwater and nonpoint source pollution,some of which is also <br /> handled by wastewater utilities. <br /> In 2007,capital spending by these utilities was substantially higher.According <br /> to estimates from the State Controller's Office, publicly owned water utilities <br /> invested roughly$3.6 billion and wastewater utilities roughly$2.2 billion(2008$). <br /> (U.S. Census of Governments estimates put total capital outlays for water in <br /> 55. U.S.Environmental Protection Agency(2008,2009).Estimates of both needs and capital outlays reported in the <br /> text exclude interest payments. <br />