Laserfiche WebLink
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Report Griffith Energy Storage Project <br /> CalEEMod to calculate emissions from grading. Water for dust control and other construction needs would <br /> be trucked to the site. The Project would comply with SJVAPCD Rule 8021 to control dust emissions <br /> generated during grading activities. During the site and substation preparation and grading subphase,four <br /> generators will be used: two will operate eight hours per day and two will operate 24 hours per day. <br /> The second stage would involve construction of the energy storage enclosures and substation installation.A <br /> substation pad for the step-up transformer would be poured, followed by the installation of the medium- <br /> voltage stations,wiring of the modules through combiner boxes, and construction of the Project substation <br /> and grid interconnection. The medium-voltage stations would sit on concrete foundations or driven piles, <br /> pending final design. Off-road equipment in the CaIEEMod model conservatively assumed that equipment <br /> for concrete foundations would be required. The third stage would be installation of the gen-tie line <br /> foundation and tower erection. The fourth stage would continue the gen-tie line installation including the <br /> pulling and stinging of the wires. The fifth and final phase of construction will include commissioning and <br /> testing. <br /> The onsite construction workforce would consist of laborers, craftspeople, supervisory personnel, and <br /> support personnel. The onsite assembly and construction workforce is expected to reach a peak of <br /> approximately 60 workers; the average number of workers onsite is anticipated to be between 10 and 60 <br /> workers, depending on the construction phase. On average, it is anticipated that each worker will <br /> generate one round trip to the Project per workday. Workers could reside in any number of local <br /> communities or hotels. Due to the proximity of the city of Tracy and good availability of hotels and lodging <br /> there, it is likely many workers will stay there. The other closest residential locations to the Project are the <br /> hotels in Ulmar, Livermore, and Pleasanton. Additional nearby communities include Verona, Asco, Dublin, <br /> Lathrop, and Manteca. The nearest large urban areas are Tracy (9 miles, 18 minutes) and Ulmar <br /> (12 miles, 18 minutes). Because both are close in proximity, both will be included in analysis as possible <br /> commuting locations. Because so many local communities exist, the analysis did not consider all possible <br /> locations. It has been simplified to be representative and conservative. The communities in addition to <br /> Tracy and Ulmar that are included are Dublin (25 miles, 28 minutes) and Manteca (27 miles, 40 minutes). <br /> An estimated 40 percent of workers are estimated to come from Tracy, 30 percent from Ulmar, 15 percent <br /> from Dublin, and 15 percent from Manteca). Workers would reach the site using existing roads, accessing <br /> the Project site from Interstate 580 to Patterson Pass Road and Midway Road. The majority of the truck <br /> deliveries would be for the energy storage enclosures and power conversion system installation, as well <br /> as any aggregate material that may be required for foundations. Construction would occur primarily <br /> during daylight hours. <br /> Vehicle use of area roadways resulting from Project construction activities would be limited to the <br /> 15-month construction period, as workers and materials are transported to and from the Project site. <br /> Construction workers would be encouraged to carpool in order to minimize vehicle trips. <br /> Construction is anticipated to commence as early as 2024 and would occur over the course of 15 months. <br /> Construction scenario assumptions, including phasing, equipment, and vehicle trips, were based on <br /> information provided by the applicant. The CaIEEMod model divides the construction processes into <br /> phases, which can be modified to fit Project specifications. As a conservative analysis, construction was <br /> assumed to begin at the start of 2024, though it is likely to commence later in the year. By assuming all <br /> major construction activity occurs in 2024, annual emissions would be higher than if emissions were <br /> divided between two construction years. As shown in Table 5, the second stage would overlap with both <br /> the third and fourth stages(the third and fourth stages would not occur simultaneously),with energy storage <br /> enclosures and substation installation occurring during weeks 17 through 52, gen-tie line foundation and <br /> tower erection occurring during weeks 41 through 46, and gen-tie line installation, pulling, and stringing <br /> occurring during weeks 47 through 52, and the CaIEEMod model reflects this concurrent schedule. It was <br /> also assumed that construction equipment would operate for 5 days per week during Project construction. <br /> OTETRA TECH 20 July 2023 <br />