Laserfiche WebLink
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Report Griffith Energy Storage Project <br /> While AB 32 aimed to reduce emissions to 1990 levels by year 2020, SB 32 was later passed and aimed <br /> to further reduce emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. A new threshold has not been determined <br /> but is expected to decrease over time in order to reduce project GHG emissions to meet SB 32 targets <br /> beyond 2020. <br /> 3.3.2 Approach and Methodology <br /> A GHG analysis is required to be included in CEQA documents for all non-exempt projects. SJVAPCD <br /> supports the use of the interim thresholds as established by the CAPCOA when adopted thresholds are <br /> not applicable. A new threshold has not been established to meet SB 32 targets beyond 2020 CAPCOA <br /> proposes that projects amortize construction emissions over the 30-year lifetime of any given project. <br /> Project construction emissions can be amortized by calculating total construction period emissions and <br /> dividing by the 30-year lifetime of the Project. <br /> For this Project, the major source of GHG is the combustion of fuel in construction equipment, in vehicles <br /> used to haul materials, and in vehicles used by workers commuting to and from the site. <br /> There are three types of GHG from fuel combustion, including CO2, CH4 and N2O. GHG emissions are <br /> presented as CO2e and is computed based on global warming equivalence. The CH4 global warming <br /> equivalence is 25 times that of CO2, and the N2O global warming equivalence is 298 times that of CO2. <br /> Mathematically, the CO2e can be represented by the following equation: <br /> CO2e Emissions = CO2 Emissions + 25 x CH4 Emissions + 298 x N2O Emissions <br /> The CalEEMod model was used to estimate the GHG emissions during the construction phase of the <br /> proposed Project. Based on the construction schedule, types and quantities of construction equipment, <br /> and haul trucks, etc., the maximum CO2e emissions were estimated. The CalEEMod model provides a <br /> CO2 profile only and does not quantify CO2e, CH4 and N2O emissions. The analysis assumed that the <br /> CO2 emissions are CO2e. For typical diesel-fueled combustion equipment used in construction activities, <br /> the emissions factors adjusted with global warming equivalence are the following: <br /> 1. CO2 emission factors are 22.4 pounds of CO2e per gallon consumed <br /> 2. CH4 emission factors are 0.065 pounds of CO2e per gallon consumed <br /> 3. N2O emission factors are 0.068 pounds of CO2. per gallon consumed <br /> As shown in these emission factors, the CO2 profile is 99 percent of the total GHG emissions generated in <br /> combustion equipment. <br /> Additionally, GHG emissions are associated with fugitive emissions of SFs from gas-insulated switchgear <br /> equipment, such as the high voltage circuit breakers at the on-site substation and R-134A leaking from <br /> the battery cooling systems. The SFs global warming potential (GWP) is 22,800 times that of CO2. The <br /> Project will have no more than two high-voltage circuit breakers, each with up to 160 pounds of SFs for a <br /> total of up to 320 pounds, and a maximum leak rate of 0.5 percent per year. CO2e resulting from SFs gas <br /> leakage can be represented by the following equation: <br /> CO2e Emissions = SFs gas contained in equipment(lbs)x 0.5% leak rate per year x <br /> 0.0004536 MT/Ib x 22,800 <br /> The R-134A GWP us 1,430 times that of CO2. The Project will have approximately 500 battery <br /> storage units with a leak rate of approximately 0.035 pounds of R-1 34A per unit. CO2e resulting <br /> from R-1 34A leakage can be represented by the following equation: <br /> CO2e Emissions = R-134A leak rate (0.035 lbs) x 500 battery units x 0.0004536 MT/Ib x <br /> 1,430 <br /> OTETRA TECH 36 July 2023 <br />