Laserfiche WebLink
Executive Summary <br /> Table EX-1. Summary of Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures <br /> Level of <br /> Potential Impacts Significance Mitigation Measures <br /> AESTHETICS <br /> IMPACT 4.1-1: Would the project have substantial adverse effect on a Less than No mitigation required. <br /> scenic vista? Significant <br /> IMPACT 4.1-2: Would the project substantially damage scenic No Impact No mitigation required. <br /> resources including, but not limited to,trees, rock outcroppings, and <br /> historic buildings within a state scenic highway? <br /> IMPACT 4.1-3: In non-urbanized area,would the project substantially Construction/ AES-1. The following measure will be implemented as feasible to reduce visual <br /> degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the Decommissioning: impacts for Project components and activities: <br /> site and its surroundings?(Public views are those that are Less than 00 Use and maintain, as feasible, non-reflective materials, finishes, and surface <br /> experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in Significant; <br /> an urbanized area,would the project conflict with applicable zoning Operations: Less treatments. <br /> and other regulations of governing scenic quality? than Significant 00 Maintain painted, treated, stained, or coated surfaces properly. <br /> Impact with 00 Direct lights properly to eliminate light spill and trespass. <br /> Mitigation 00 Use timers or motion sensors, as feasible, on all project lighting to minimize <br /> Incorporated unnecessary lighting. <br /> 00 Minimize lighting usage, as feasible, during construction and operations. <br /> IMPACT 4.1-4: Would the project create a new source of substantial Less than No mitigation required. <br /> light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in Significant Impact <br /> the area? <br /> Agriculture and Forestry Resources <br /> IMPACT 4.2-1: Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique No Impact No mitigation required <br /> Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance(Farmland), as shown <br /> on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and <br /> Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- <br /> agricultural use? <br /> IMPACT 4.2-2: Would the project conflict with existing zoning for Less than AGRA: Williamson Act Cancellation <br /> agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Significant Impact The Applicant shall file a Petition for Cancellation of Contract for the Williamson <br /> with Mitigation Act Contract on the San Joaquin County portion of the Project site, for <br /> Incorporated consideration by the San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors, prior to <br /> construction. <br /> IMPACT 4.2-3:Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or No Impact No mitigation required. <br /> cause rezoning of,forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code <br /> section 12220(g)), timberland as defined by Public Resource Code <br /> Griffith Energy Storage Project ES-5 Tetra Tech/SCH2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />