My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
** PLEASE CHECK LOOKUP - if good, then Approve QCStatus, else update with correct RECORD_ID (4)
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
4900
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PR0420087
>
** PLEASE CHECK LOOKUP - if good, then Approve QCStatus, else update with correct RECORD_ID (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:52:29 PM
Creation date
12/18/2023 10:12:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
PR0420087
PE
4242
FACILITY_ID
FA0002643
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON VERDE MOBILE HOME PRK
STREET_NUMBER
4900
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212
APN
08704015
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4900 N HWY 99
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 1 1-6 <br /> NITROGEN EFFLUENT LIMIT EVALUATION <br /> ORDER WQ 2014-0153-DWQ <br /> GENERAL WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS <br /> FOR SMALL DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS <br /> Step B — Nitrogen Effluent Limit Evaluation <br /> If a Regional Water Board's Basin Plan addresses the area where the site is located, the <br /> nitrogen control measures shall be consistent with the Basin Plan. <br /> If the Step A evaluation indicated additional treatment for nitrogen control may be <br /> necessary, continue the evaluation at "Step B, Nitrogen Effluent Limit Determination." <br /> B1 Nitrogen Limits Required? The initial evaluation of the need for nitrogen control <br /> (discussed in Item A5) shall include comparison of the wastewater effluent quality to <br /> groundwater quality and the potential for the wastewater discharge to cause or <br /> contribute to a condition of pollution or nuisance. The benefits of nitrogen control <br /> should be balanced with the cost of implementing nitrogen control. <br /> Measures implemented to protect groundwater quality (e.g. equipping a pond with a <br /> synthetic or low permeability liner to reduce infiltration, using supplemental water to <br /> reduce LAA loading rates, or agronomic application of nitrogen) should be considered <br /> when determining the need for nitrogen effluent limits. <br /> B2 Low-Threat (Adequate Attenuation)? In low-threat situations, the 50 percent nitrogen <br /> removal (in effluent prior to discharge) is appropriate. Low-threat situations are those <br /> where additional nitrogen removal will occur in the dispersal area (e.g. land application <br /> crop uptake, denitrification, shallow dispersal area, etc.) or where adequate <br /> attenuation exists based on other conditions such as depth to groundwater. <br /> B3 High-Threat (Limited Attenuation)? In high-threat situations, the 10 milligrams per liter <br /> (mg/L) effluent limit is appropriate. High-threat situations are those where limited <br /> nitrogen removal will occur in the dispersal area or in limited attenuation situations <br /> (e.g. shallow depth to groundwater, fractured aquifer, potential for groundwater to <br /> migrate to surface water bodies with limited attenuation, etc.). <br /> September 23, 2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.