SU0015341 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Potentially Less Than Less Than Analyzed Significant Significant with Significant No In The g Mitigation g Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Prior EIR XVII . TRANSPORTATION . Would the project: a ) Conflict with a program plan , ordinance , or policy addressing the circulation system , including transit , El ❑ © El roadways , bicycle , and pedestrian facilities ? b ) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064 . 3 , subdivision ( b ) ? ❑ ❑ © ❑ ❑ c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature ( e . g . , sharp curves or dangerous intersections ) or ❑ ❑ Z ❑ ❑ incompatible uses ( e . g . , farm equipment) ? d ) Result in inadequate emergency access ? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Impact Discussion : This project is comprised of three applications : General Plan Amendment No . PA-2200277 to amend the map designation of 2 APN ' s composed of 10 legal lots from C/C ( Community Commercial ) to R/ M ( Medium Density Residential ) and Zone Reclassification No . PA-2200278 , which proposes to change the current zoning designation of the same parcels from C - C ( Community Commercial) and P - F ( Public Facilities ) to R- M ( Medium Density Residential ) ; and an Administrative Use Permit to develop a Mufti- Unit Residential project to include a two - story four- plex totaling 4 , 184 square feet and an 822 square foot accessory dwelling unit on a new parcel configuration created by Lot Line Adjustment No . PA-2200168 . The project site currently has eight existing non -conforming single-family dwellings and proposes the demolition of four existing single -family residences and an accessory storage structure . Additionally , the project proposes to construct two single family residences , two accessory dwelling units and two duplexes . a-d ) The project was reviewed for Vehicle Miles Traveled , and the County determined the project would generate less than 110 trips per day . Therefore , the project is considered a small project according to the Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA , as published by the California Office of Planning and research ( OPR ) in December 2018 . According to this OPR guidance , a small project that generates or attracts "fewer than 110 trips per day generally may be assumed to cause less -than - significant transportation impact" with regards to VMT . The project is not expected to conflict with any program plans , ordinances , or policies addressing the vehicle circulation system . There will be no changes to the geometric design of roads or to emergency access routes . The existing driveways meet all applicable Development Title Standards . Therefore , the proposed project will have adequate emergency access . As a result , the project will have less than significant impact on transportation . 28