My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_2019-2025
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
23023
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0504907
>
CORRESPONDENCE_2019-2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2024 9:35:11 AM
Creation date
7/11/2024 9:10:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2019-2025
RECORD_ID
PR0504907
PE
4430
FACILITY_ID
FA0006398
FACILITY_NAME
SNYDERS SANITARY
STREET_NUMBER
23023
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
Zip
95320
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
23023 S SANTA FE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN 10 A Q U I N Environmental Health Department <br /> COUNTY <br /> 2002 Study) by Ninyo & Moore (provided as Attachment B in the Work Plan). It <br /> appears that the locations of the trenches somewhat align with the estimated extent <br /> of debris and/or refuse provided in Figure 1 of Attachment I with the following <br /> exceptions: <br /> a. Area between Trench Location 1 and the northern property boundary. <br /> b. Area along the southwestern corner near Trench Locations 26 and "ASH 1." <br /> The Work Plan should include trenching in these areas to fully delineate the extent of <br /> the waste shown in Attachment I. <br /> 2. The Work Plan states that trenching will be used to determine if buried waste is <br /> present but is unclear of how the lateral and vertical limit of waste will be confirmed. <br /> Trenching should be used to find these limits of the waste by digging both laterally and <br /> vertically until native is discovered. It is LEA understanding that Figure 1 in Attachment <br /> I represent an "estimated" extent based on interpolations of the data only. The October <br /> 2002 Study did not fully delineate the waste extent. As such, the Work Plan should be <br /> revised to describe how trenching will continue until native soil is encountered both <br /> laterally and vertically on the property so a more accurate figure can be produced. <br /> 3. The Work Plan does not propose collecting any samples for laboratory analysis. <br /> Since the trenches are in different areas from the October 2002 Study, the waste <br /> discovered should be sampled for the following chemicals that were found in the <br /> October 2002 Study using the same methods: <br /> a. CAM 17 Metals <br /> b. Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration (STLC) and STLC Deionized Water (STLC <br /> DI-WET) for specific Title 22 metals that exceeded 10 times their respective <br /> thresholds in accordance with federal and state hazardous waste criteria. <br /> c. Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) by USEPA Method <br /> 6010/7471A for those samples containing the highest metal concentrations to <br /> evaluate whether the waste would be classified as federal hazardous. <br /> d. Reference: DTSC Hazardous Waste Classification: <br /> https://dtsc.ca.gov/tclp-and-wet-test-methods/ <br /> 4. Attachment I of the Work Plan found some organic debris and refuse within the <br /> trenches on the property. Although no landfill gases were found in the October 2002 <br /> Study in those trenches, there still exists a potential due to these contents. As such, <br /> the LEA requests that the trenching activities be monitored for methane as a health <br /> and safety precaution. Results from the monitoring should be included in the final <br /> 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.