Laserfiche WebLink
Forward, Inc. - 2 - 27 March 2023 <br />1. Proposed groundwater monitoring well AMW-52s shall not have a screen interval greater <br />than 20 feet in length and shall be installed such that the screen interval intersects the water <br />table. <br />2. All monitoring wells shall be developed such that the measured turbidity is equal to or below <br />5 NTUs. Following development, the wells should rest for a period time prior to purging and <br />then sampling. If elevated turbidity is an issue, please take the necessary steps to properly <br />engineer and construct the filter pack interval, and the slotted interval. Forward, Inc. should <br />consider using a tremie pipe when placing all material in the well annulus. Adding the use of <br />a surge block during the introduction of filter pack material can improve the performance of <br />the well. Prepacking the well screen is another engineered practice that has been shown to <br />reduce turbidity in wells. If turbidity cannot be achieved after multiple development efforts, <br />then Forward, Inc will need to submit a plan to re-install/reconstruct the monitoring wells. <br />3. Based on the proposed piezometer construction details in Table 1 of the workplan for PZ-4, <br />PZ-5 and PZ-6, these are to be constructed as observation wells for the aquifer testing. <br />Following the aquifer tests, these wells shall be become a part of the well network and shall <br />be monitored in accordance with the monitoring schedule in the MRP. Prior to long-term <br />sampling these wells should be designated as a monitoring well “MW” to reduce confusion. <br />The first sampling following development shall include all analytes listed on the 5-year <br />sampling event in the MRP. The Geotracker database account for this site shall be set up <br />such that these three observation wells are identified as monitoring wells. <br />4. Since Forward Inc., has proposed extraction wells EW-2, EW-3 and EW-4 only to be <br />installed in the intermediate aquifer zone with no additional extraction wells with proposed in <br />the shallow zone, it does not seem that these small diameter wells will be able to achieve <br />compliance with the CAO which requires Forward Inc., to optimize the extraction rate to <br />address contamination present in both the shallow and intermediate aquifer zones, as well <br />as create a measurable drawdown in the wells Forward Inc., installed at the edge of the <br />plume. <br />For clarification of the requirements in the CAO, Item 3c states in part, “…The <br />extraction wells shall be located near the center of plume mass and must be able to <br />contain and treat the VOCs, create an inward gradient of the groundwater table, <br />measured from existing monitoring wells within the plume, in all zones affected by the <br />release….” As previously stated in our letter dated 24 March 2022, the Central Valley <br />Water Board staff cannot direct the Discharger on how to comply with the requirements <br />of the CAO. The bulleted list above clearly identifies Central Valley Water Board staff’s <br />concerns. At this time, Forward, Inc may proceed with the well installation, with the <br />understanding additional extraction wells may be necessary to address all zones <br />affected by the release”, and create the required the inward gradient. Considering the <br />amount of time it has taken to install these wells, failure to comply with the conditions of <br />the CAO will initiate further enforcement. <br />Following the completion of the field work, Forward Inc is required by the CAO to <br />submit the following information: “…the Discharger shall submit an Interim <br />Groundwater Plume Remediation System Installation Report that certifies the <br />installation and continuous operation of the additional groundwater extraction wells. <br />Once installed, the extraction wells shall be monitored weekly for flow...”. <br />Again, to clarify the requirements in the Order,the CAO states: “If the Discharger fails