My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEBER
>
1320
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0547236
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2026 8:30:35 AM
Creation date
9/16/2025 4:46:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0547236
PE
2950 - ENVIRON ASSESS
FACILITY_ID
FA0026813
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON COLD STORAGE FACILITY
STREET_NUMBER
1320
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WEBER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
145190120
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
Site Address
1320 W WEBER AVE STOCKTON 95203
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Injury and Illness <br /> Prevention Program 2.22 <br /> For each hazard category, the potential hazard should be further described. For instance, with the example <br /> described in Step 1 above, a potential hazard associated with the monitoring well gauging and sampling task— <br /> specifically, the job step to `access well with hand tools"— may include CAUGHT— pinch points when handling <br /> well cover. <br /> Step 3— Determine Mitigative Actions <br /> After the potential hazard(s) have been identified, evaluate if the job step can be performed in a manner where the <br /> hazard is eliminated, reduced, or controlled. Common methods to eliminate, reduce, or control potential hazards <br /> that follow the hierarchy of controls may include, but are not limited to, one or a combination of the following: <br /> • Eliminating or substituting a job step with a less hazardous operation. <br /> • Combining job steps or changing the sequence. <br /> • Instituting engineering controls. <br /> • Obtaining other tools or redesigning equipment. <br /> • Performing ambient monitoring or screening. <br /> • Obtaining additional safety equipment including personal protective equipment (PPE). <br /> • Adding warning devices. <br /> Mitigative actions should be specific and avoid using generalizations such as "be careful' or "use caution." There <br /> must be at least one mitigative action for each potential hazard. PPE should never be the only mitigative action. It <br /> is the last line of defense. Taking the example illustrated in Steps 1 and 2 above, mitigative actions for the potential <br /> hazard"CAUGHT—pinch points when handling well cover"may include 1) wearing leather gloves; 2) using pry bar <br /> when accessing the well cover; 3) keeping hands/fingers clear between cover and collar, ... etc. <br /> Inspections (Field Audits) <br /> Roux provides a variety of health and safety tools, including two inspection processes, Roux Peer Observations <br /> (RPOs)and Field Audits. These tools are available to all employees and provide opportunities for both peer-to-peer <br /> and management-to-peer inspections of job sites. These scheduled periodic inspections assist in identifying unsafe <br /> behaviors, work practices, and conditions. <br /> RPOs are scheduled activities where one individual observes another completing a task. The purpose of the RPO <br /> is to ensure individuals perform work tasks according to standard operating procedures and in a safe and healthy <br /> work environment. During this type of inspection, the observer is focused on the work process, not the individual <br /> (the worker remains anonymous). The goal of RPOs is to positively reinforce correct behaviors and to identify and <br /> eliminate undesirable behaviors and conditions. <br /> Field audits are performed by Roux personnel, from peers to senior management, to check that health and safety <br /> requirements are being met and demonstrate management leadership in the health and safety program. The audits <br /> focus on how our health and safety tools are being implemented and when we are providing oversight of <br /> Subcontractor operations to ensure the Subcontractor is meeting our health and safety requirements. <br /> At any time during a Field Audit or RPO, if an imminent safety hazard, emergency situation, or other potentially <br /> dangerous situation arises, the auditor is instructed to implement Stop Work Authority until the hazard can be <br /> mitigated appropriately. <br /> Audit findings are documented on a Field Audit Checklist or RPO Form, and any recommended corrective actions <br /> are discussed with the field personnel and their project management immediately following the audit/observation. <br /> 03/2025 Corporate Health and Safety Management Program I ROUX 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.