My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2026
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1234
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0516248
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2026 9:50:06 AM
Creation date
1/16/2026 9:04:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2026
RECORD_ID
PR0516248
PE
2361 - UST FACILITY
FACILITY_ID
FA0012532
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON STATION #209167
STREET_NUMBER
1234
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22120016
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\kblackwell
Supplemental fields
Site Address
1234 E YOSEMITE AVE MANTECA 95336
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Underground Storage Tank <br /> Release Detection Equipment Testing Report Form <br /> 5. MONITORING SYSTEM AND PROGRAMMING <br /> A separate Release Detection Equipment Testing Report form must be prepared for each <br /> monitoring system. <br /> Manufacturer of Monitoring Model of Monitoring System Software Version Installed <br /> System Control Panel Gontrol Panel <br /> Veeder Root TLS-350 335.00 <br /> Attach the post-testing reports if the monitoring system is capable of generating Yes No NA <br /> either.• 0 Monitoring System Set-up Report Z Alarm History Report <br /> Is all release detection equipment that was tested operational per manufacturer's. ❑ <br /> specifications? <br /> Is the secondary containment free of damage; debris, or liquid? 0 ❑ <br /> Are the release detection audible and visual alarms operational? ❑ <br /> Have all sensors been: 1) visually inspected for wiring kinks, breaks and residual 0 ❑ ❑ <br /> buildup on floats; and 2) tested for functionality and confirmed operational? <br /> Are all sensors installed to detect a release at the earliest opportunity? 0 ❑ ❑ <br /> Was the monitoring system set-up reviewed, and proper settings confirmed? 0 ❑ ❑ <br /> Was the monitoring system's backup battery visually inspected, functionally tested, 0 ❑ ❑ <br /> and confirmed operational? <br /> Was it confirmed that the flow of hazardous substance stops at the dispenser if a 0 ❑ ❑ <br /> release is detected in the under-dispenser containment? <br /> Does the pressure supply pump automatically shut down if the piping secondary 0 ❑ ❑ <br /> containment monitoring system fails to operate or is disconnected? <br /> Does the pressure supply pump automatically shut down if the piping secondary <br /> containment monitoring system detects a release's Which sensors initiate positive. Z ❑ ❑ <br /> shut down? (Check all that apply) Z Containment Sump 0 UDC <br /> If re+ease detection alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring center, is all 0 ❑ Q <br /> communication equipment operational? <br /> If there is any buried single-wall suction hazardous substance piping, was it <br /> confirmed using the inspection method approved by the Unified Program Agency, ❑ ❑ 0 <br /> that the pipe contents drain back into the UST if the suction is released? <br /> Describe all answers marked "No" or "Fail'and the proposed remedy in Section S. <br /> List all equipment either replaced or repaired (including cleaning or adjustment) in Section B. <br /> Page 2of6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.