My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
1250
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0548036
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2026 2:59:14 PM
Creation date
3/12/2026 2:51:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0548036
PE
2959 - DTSC LEAD AGENCY SITE
FACILITY_ID
FA0027410
FACILITY_NAME
MARTIN METALS FINISHING,INC (FORMER)
STREET_NUMBER
1250
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15512007,15512014,15
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
Site Address
1250 S WILSON WAY STOCKTON 95205
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
g. <br /> �M Appendix A. Responsiveness Summary <br /> Martin Metals Finishing Inc. (Former) <br /> Stockton, California <br /> Response to Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Comments for CDIM's Preliminary <br /> Endangerment Assessment (PEA) and Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI)Work Plan (Work Plan), <br /> Martin Metal Finishing Inc. Stockton California, dated July 25, 2022. <br /> Comment I Response <br /> Andrew Leavitt, P.G., Senior Engineering Geologist, Geological Services Branch (GSB)—PEA Comments <br /> 1. The GSB generally agrees with the findings and Comment acknowledged. <br /> conclusions of the PEA. The limited analytical data <br /> collected between 1984 and 1989 suggest the <br /> potential for an unauthorized release of COPCs as a <br /> result of MMF's historical on-Site operations. <br /> 2. The GSB also concurs with CDIM's conclusion Comment acknowledged. <br /> that MMF's historical on-Site operations included <br /> the use of solvents, and therefore, a potential vapor <br /> intrusion threat exists from impacted soil vapor for <br /> the existing on-Site building. <br /> 3. Page 13, Section 2.8—CDIM's third conclusion in These conclusions are not included in the PEA Work <br /> the PEA states, "Based on a review of historic data Plan, and the conclusion addressed in this comment <br /> (Table 2)and limited receptors (Section 2.6), the will be reassessed in the PEA Report following the <br /> past releases do not appear to pose a threat to collection of new data. <br /> public health or the environment." Upon review of <br /> the analytical table for sediment and soil presented <br /> in Table 2, the GSB does not agree with this <br /> conclusion. <br /> • For total chromium, copper, and zinc, the <br /> DTSC's Human and Ecological Risk Office <br /> (HERO) Note 3 does not currently have a <br /> screening level (SL). In lieu, CDIM <br /> evaluated concentrations of these three <br /> metals against Terrestrial Habitat ESLs. <br /> Several detected concentrations of all three <br /> metals exceed these ESLs. This would <br /> indicate that there is a threat to the <br /> environment. It should be noted that the <br /> GSB recommends using the DTSC's HERO <br /> Note 3 SLs going forward. <br /> • Three of detected concentrations of lead in <br /> sediment and soil exceed the DTSC's <br /> HERO Note 3 SL of 320 mg/kg. This <br /> indicated a potential threat to both human <br /> health and the environment. Additionally, <br /> several sludge samples contained elevated <br /> concentrations of lead. While there is no SL <br /> established for"sludge,"the potential exists <br /> Page A-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.