Laserfiche WebLink
Countryside Market, Stockton - 3 - 12 December 2023 <br /> potential future vapor intrusion risk. At least one of the soil gas wells should be <br /> located in the vicinity of the former dispenser island as it is the most likely source <br /> of shallow impact to soil at the Site. Additionally, please include shallow lithology <br /> in your evaluation of locations for soil gas wells, and attempt to target sandy soil <br /> where possible. You will need to submit a work plan and assessment report for <br /> this work. <br /> In the initial meeting, the JET had agreed that soil gas sampling would be <br /> completed following completion of SVE remediation. However, in the follow-up <br /> meeting, OSCF and Central Valley Water Board staff agreed that the existing <br /> SVE wells are sufficiently deep so as to not affect the collection of shallow soil <br /> gas samples while the system is operating. We also agreed that soil gas <br /> samples should be collected sooner rather than later so as to determine if there <br /> is a vapor intrusion risk and evaluate the potential need to expand the SVE <br /> system to address shallow soil gas impact. <br /> 8. Downgradient domestic supply well DW10967 has a well-head treatment system <br /> with granular activated carbon (GAC) filter media. In order to ensure clean <br /> drinking water for the residents of this property, the JET agreed that budget for <br /> one replacement of the GAC media is needed. <br /> 9. Existing Site SVE wells are screened 30-60 feet bgs and 60-80 feet bgs. In the <br /> event that the requested soil gas sampling indicates a significant vapor intrusion <br /> risk, the existing SVE wells are too deep to remediate hydrocarbon impact to <br /> shallow soil. As such, in the follow-up meeting OSCF and Central Valley Water <br /> Board staff agreed that the grant amendment should include contingency costs <br /> for the installation of up to three SVE wells to be installed as needed based on <br /> soil gas results. Associated work plan and summary report will be needed as <br /> well. <br /> 10.The JET agreed that the grant amendment should include contingency costs for <br /> the following case closure proceedings: <br /> a. Preparation and submittal of an evaluation of Site conditions against LTCP <br /> criteria. <br /> b. Preparation and mailing of a pre-closure public comment fact sheet. <br /> c. Destruction of all remaining Site monitoring and remediation wells. <br /> i. Well destructions in San Joaquin County should all be budgeted for <br /> over-drilling as San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Department provides variances for pressure grout destruction only <br /> in limited cases. <br /> ii. Sufficient costs for city and county drilling permits or encroachment <br /> permits should be included. <br /> iii. Sufficient costs for communication with off-Site property owners to <br /> gain right-of-entry should be included as needed. <br /> d. Decommissioning of Site remediation equipment and the associated <br /> equipment enclosure compound. <br />