My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2560
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0548313
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2026 2:41:20 PM
Creation date
6/23/2026 2:19:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0548313
PE
2960 - RWQCB LEAD AGENCY CLEAN UP SITE
FACILITY_ID
FA0027581
FACILITY_NAME
TESORO STOCKTON TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
2560
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14503012
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
Site Address
2560 W WASHINGTON ST STOCKTON 95203
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A=COM <br /> surrounding surface is gravel.The foam drums at the East Annex are located on the finished concrete <br /> surface. Both conditions at the East Annex prevent direct release of foam to ground surface. <br /> c. All available records of past AFFF storage or release were submitted as part of the preliminary work <br /> plan submission in 2021. <br /> d. The safety data sheet for the AR-AFFF used at the site is attached. <br /> Comment 2: Section 2.2 of the Work Plan documents the reported foam use at the truck rack area in <br /> the West Terminal in 2005. The Work Plan does not explain why the foam was discharged(e.g., due <br /> to a fire accident, annual testing, or system malfunction, among others). Please clarify the cause(s) for <br /> the foam discharge in 2005. <br /> Response: Terminal staff verbally explained that the foam discharge, which occurred in 2005, was <br /> the result of a valve misalignment. As described in the work plan, the foam that was released was <br /> contained and cleaned up. <br /> Comment 3: Section 3.1 of the Work Plan does not include adequate spatial coverage, in both <br /> horizontal and vertical directions, of the groundwater downgradient from the potential source zone in <br /> the West Terminal. In the horizontal direction, no monitoring well was proposed for the area northeast <br /> of the potential source zone. In the vertical direction, all the proposed monitoring wells are screened in <br /> the A-Zone and do not cover the B-Zone. Considering the likely downward and northeast groundwater <br /> flows on Site, please add monitoring wells TS/M-5, SP/WC-1M, and SP/WC-1S to the proposed PFAS <br /> groundwater sampling network for the West Terminal. <br /> Response: The requested wells TS/M-5, SP/WC-1 M, and SP/WC-1 S will be included in the proposed <br /> PFAS groundwater sampling network for the West Terminal. As discussed on the review call on <br /> November 18, 2022, well TS/M-5 may periodically be considered a downgradient well as A-Zone <br /> water levels vary at the Site and, as such, this well will be added for PFAS groundwater sampling <br /> (Figure 3). In addition, it should be reiterated that SP/WC-1 M (B-zone) and SP/WC-1 S (A-zone) are <br /> off-site wells and may be representative of upgradient conditions including but not limited to the West <br /> Terminal (Figure 3). The original groundwater sampling locations proposed in the 2021 work plan are <br /> not changed. <br /> Comment 4: Section 3.1 of the Work Plan proposes no groundwater samples from the East Annex <br /> due to the lack of existing monitoring wells near the foam storage areas. Considering the shallow <br /> groundwater table on Site and the storage and use history of AR-AFFF at the East Annex, the Central <br /> Valley Water Board staff considers it essential to collect groundwater samples from the East Annex. <br /> Please propose groundwater sampling locations near the possible PFAS source areas, including but <br /> not limited to the foam storage and fire monitor areas and the railcar offloading rack in the East <br /> Annex. Groundwater samples may be collected from existing monitoring wells, new wells, temporary <br /> wells, or using other methods (e.g., direct-push grab samples) compatible with PFAS sampling. <br /> Additionally, please collect groundwater samples from both A-Zone and B-Zone. <br /> Response: Existing groundwater monitoring wells AR/MW-21A and PS/WC-18, both A-Zone wells, <br /> located on the East Annex will be sampled (Figure 4). Well AR/MW-21A is considered the upgradient <br /> well for the two AFFF storage locations at the East Annex. Well PS/WC-18 serves as the proximal <br /> groundwater sampling location to the AFFF storage locations at the site. <br /> A grab groundwater sample from the A-Zone will be collected from a hand auger borehole location as <br /> approximately shown in Figure 4. It is anticipated that the borehole will be excavated to approximately <br /> 2 to 3 feet into groundwater prior to collecting the grab groundwater sample using a clean stainless- <br /> steel bailer. <br /> Comment 5: Section 3.1 of the Work Plan proposes no stormwater samples from the East Annex or <br /> the West Terminal. Considering the storage and use history of AR-AFFF at both properties, the <br /> Central Valley Water Board staff considers it essential to evaluate whether PFAS chemicals are <br /> transported off-site through stormwater runoff. Please propose stormwater sampling for the foam <br /> aecom.com <br /> 2/5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.