My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Permits & Development - Encroachment(EP)/Driveway(DW) Permits - 2007_EP-07-201 thru EP-07-300_ - EP-07-266
PublicWorks
>
- PUBLIC SERVICES
>
PERMITS & DEVELOPMENT
>
Encroachment(EP)/Driveway(DW) Permits
>
2007
>
EP-07-201 thru EP-07-300
>
Permits & Development - Encroachment(EP)/Driveway(DW) Permits - 2007_EP-07-201 thru EP-07-300_ - EP-07-266
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 10:44:43 AM
Creation date
12/30/2015 9:52:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Permits_Development
DocName
EP-07-266
Category07
Encroachment(EP)/Driveway(DW) Permits
SubCategory07
2007\EP-07-201 thru EP-07-300
Year2
2007
Supplemental fields
Applicant
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
Contracts
CrossReference
Date Entered
8/30/2007
Description
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
DocCategory
Permit Applications (PA)
Notes
Owners
Parcel Address
W/S OF WELTY RD. APPROX. 1,000 FT. N/O STE. HWY.
Primary Parcel
Type (2)
Tags
Permits_Development
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Amy Terrell <br /> 20 August 2007 <br /> Page 2 <br /> groundwater zone at 28 locations in the test plot. Post-injection monitoring has continued to the <br /> present, in accordance with California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley <br /> Region (RWQCB) Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP)No. R5-2003-0815. <br /> On behalf of WFS, Geosyntec prepared a Pilot Study Assessment Report that was submitted to <br /> the RWQCB on 20 April 2007. The report recommended modifying the existing pilot test in <br /> order to confirm the ability of in-situ anaerobic methods to degrade COCs still present in <br /> groundwater at the Site. <br /> RWQCB staff discussed the report recommendations with Geosyntec on 13 June 2007 and <br /> requested that a Work Plan be submitted with the following information: <br /> • Comparison of HRC-X®to HRC®chemistry; <br /> • An additional monitoring well downgradient of the test plot; and <br /> • A detailed layout of the injection test plot, proposed monitoring wells, and existing Site <br /> facilities. <br /> This Work Plan includes the specific information requested by the RWQCB and presents a plan <br /> for modifying the existing pilot test. <br /> TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION AND HRC-X®CHEMISTRY <br /> HRC-X® is a Regensis product that will be injected into the uppermost groundwater. Like <br /> HRC®, which was used during the previous pilot test, HRC-X®is a viscous material, composed <br /> of glycerol tripolylactate. According to Regenesis, HRC-X®is chemically identical to the HRC® <br /> product used for the previous pilot test conducted at the Site <br /> (http://www.regenesis.com/products/enhAna/hrcx/). The only difference between the two <br /> compounds is that the viscosity of HRC-X® (200,000 centipoise [cp]) is significantly greater than <br /> that of HRC® (20,000 cp). The increase in viscosity should allow for a longer, controlled-release <br /> of lactic acid; thereby extending the life of the product in the ground. <br /> Once injected into the subsurface, the compound slowly releases lactic acid for periods in excess <br /> of 3 years. This source of lactic acid is then metabolized by naturally occurring microorganisms <br /> producing consistent, low-level concentrations of hydrogen. Reducing conditions developed by <br /> PAPR.12003REM\WFS\VER\VERF\2007 Expanded Pilot Work Plan\Expanded_Pilot Test WP.doc <br /> engineers I scientists I innovators <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.