My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Permits & Development - Encroachment(EP)/Driveway(DW) Permits - 2023_PS-2302501 thru PS-2303000_ - PS-2302966
PublicWorks
>
- PUBLIC SERVICES
>
PERMITS & DEVELOPMENT
>
Encroachment(EP)/Driveway(DW) Permits
>
2023
>
PS-2302501 thru PS-2303000
>
Permits & Development - Encroachment(EP)/Driveway(DW) Permits - 2023_PS-2302501 thru PS-2303000_ - PS-2302966
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/2/2024 7:45:56 AM
Creation date
10/3/2023 9:38:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Permits_Development
DocName
PS-2302966
Category07
Encroachment(EP)/Driveway(DW) Permits
Year2
2023
Notes2
SS Lincoln Rd. 750' WO Gettysburg Pl.
Address
3043 Gold Canal Dr. STE 201
Application
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc/Tim Davis
Type
Bore (over 12 inch Dia)
Supplemental fields
Cross Ref
PWP7110005
Type (2)
Encroachment Permit (EP)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Geosynteco' <br />consultants <br />Initial assessment of potential wells to be destroyed as part of this Work Plan began with <br />a review of the 2020 Request and general evaluation of the Site wide monitoring network. <br />Based on the assessment, the following well groups were preliminarily identified as <br />candidates for destruction: <br />• Wells previously identified for destruction in the 2020 Request; <br />• Piezometers located at the edge of the monitoring network; and <br />• Wells previously used for Enhanced Reduction Dechlorination (ERD) injections <br />completed in 2008, which are no longer used or monitored (LFR, 2008). <br />The wells were then evaluated based on the following criteria, as shown on Figure 2: <br />1. Is the well included in the MRP or GWMP? - If so, for the well to be considered <br />for destruction it must satisfy one of the following criteria to continue being <br />evaluated for destruction: <br />a. Is the well redundant (i.e., nearby well screened in the same zone <br />providing redundant data)? <br />b. Does the well exhibit stable or decreasing constituent of concern (COC) <br />trends at low concentrations or below the Maximum Contaminant Level <br />(MCL) for approximately 2 years? The well can additionally satisfy the <br />criteria if it is not routinely monitored for COCs (i.e., ERD wells or <br />piezometers). What constitutes "low" concentrations will be determined <br />on a per well basis. Compliance wells are not eligible for destruction under <br />this criterion. <br />c. Is the well damaged or fouled beyond repair? <br />2. Is the well needed to define the plume extent or boundary? - This criterion <br />evaluates whether the well is used for evaluating plume dynamics and is useful <br />for defining the plume boundary during active remediation. <br />3. Is the well located within the remedy footprint? — This criterion evaluates whether <br />the well is located within the current plume footprint, which is defined as any well <br />located within the treatment zone. Per the WDR-MRP guidance, the treatment <br />Well Destruction Work Am 3 June 27, 2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.