|
'402 wow&
<br /> Or
<br /> R=25.00' ,4=86"4578" L=3785' //��®® TION
<br /> _ ,/ ,n/ �pI •�-
<br /> CH-S61°11'09"E 34.34' RRORA I IO Y DETA�L t,,.11 1 V t DA I A
<br /> R-=1000,00' A=5°40'Or L=98.94' �n
<br /> CH=S, ,x'34'4,.3"W 98.90' CURVE RADIUS DEL TA LENGTH CH.8EARING CHORD
<br /> R=958.00' 4 2°41'32" L=45.02' n �/�)'' ,� 1000..00' 72`40'58" 1268.55' A153°35'18"W 1185 i9'
<br /> 52N>7 15 20 W A o , "
<br /> CH-=LATA°05': 6"£ 45.01' �1� .r--�' 81' ,52.7,5(RI) 72 39 40 ,�'R 1) 1268.18(R 1) 11 S4.x39 �'R1)
<br /> 103000' 72007'15' 1„296.5,1' A(5-T 52'08'"W 121..59'
<br /> 72'V5'48"(R ) 12SI6.O8�(R1) 1212 2 '(81)
<br /> • N� 1030 00' 43',36°17" 783..88' IV68002"' 7"W 7,65. 10'
<br /> S 17°15'20"f (R) 42 n0' 43°3, '2 ~(R.) 18. 62(R 1)
<br /> 1030 00' 28 512.63 N.32359"W 00735
<br /> 144 03 ��� � ;(�) D o "(R1) 512.46(RI)
<br /> C>
<br /> r
<br /> S F.N.
<br /> ;.\`,. ' �l '0,4 I �'I�r'Z44 �' ?% VIVIT NO. I
<br /> c�
<br /> 29
<br /> �=S FN.
<br /> S.F& A
<br /> X 2$
<br /> �..-. w
<br /> FN {,
<br /> METRO DRIVE 1V00005 i0"W 3000
<br /> SEE SHEET FOUR FAR L (WND, NO)U,, - -w-
<br /> $6'9'5-4 50T 1835.`00' ,
<br /> / RN/A GYXIRD/NA1E S.F N'' '`�' .,... �'"08 t'rS'T> -~-�. �
<br /> L'URY£)IATA AND C,AL I`0 .:._ _.. ..._.
<br /> STA
<br /> 3.35 00 670.00' ". 645.00' ANJ
<br /> LOT LINE PER
<br /> S.FN. 589154'50T 1768.00'
<br /> LOT LINE' PER ,� � � ��
<br /> M&P. 27--3, N 'THING SET !�R
<br /> fflUNl7. CORNER JS
<br /> EROR
<br /> A TIONtTA/L 6V UTILITY SERVICE
<br /> BOX
<br /> (SCALE : 1'=1509
<br /> R RA T C N NOTES:
<br /> i. THE FinD SURVEY FOR THIS FINAL MAI' DID NOT FIND ANY REMAINING LOT CORNER (3) HOLD THE TANGENT LINES AS MON./MENTE"D AND USE THE RECORD RADIUS OF
<br /> MONUMENTS FROM U.& f? 27-33, ALONG 7H NORTHERL f' AND SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY 1000.00 FEET TO FIT A TANGENT CURVE BETWEEN 1HE 11WER.SECT/NG TANGENT LINES.
<br /> LINE OF THE 1000--FOOT CENTERLINE CURVE ON METRO DRIVE AS SHOWN ON THE ALTHOUGH THIS ME7HOQ HELD THE INTENT OF THE RECORD RADIUS AND THE
<br /> P'ROR nom DETAIL. TANGENCY OF THE CURIE; .IT WA.S REJ£G'TED ON TH£ 8ASY5 THAT NEW CALCULATED
<br /> ElVDPO/NTS OF THE CURVE WOUGO &'E CREATED a 15' AND 0.28' AWAY FROM THE
<br /> 2 THE FIELD SURVEY FOR THIS FINAL GAAP DID FIND THE CENTERUNE MONUMENTS IN FOUND MONUMENTS. IT IS FELT THAT THE MONUMENTS AS FOUND INDICATE THE
<br /> METRO DRIVE, IMPERIAL WAY AND FRONTIER DRIVE AS WELL AS SEVERAL GOT CORNER INTENT OF THE ORIGINAL S41RVEY AND SHOULD BE HELD
<br /> MONUMENTS ON THE SOUTH RIGHT--OF=WAY 41NE DF YETI,'O DRIVE AS SHOWN 1N THE
<br /> PRORATION DETAIL. (4) HOLD THE TANGENT ,LINES AND ENDPOINTS AS MONUMENTED AND FIT A TANGENT C IRVE
<br /> TO THE LINES AND MONUMENTS THIS WAS REJECTED ON THE BASIS THAT THE "FITTED'°
<br /> 3 7E CENTERLINE MONUMENTS MARKING THE ENDPOINTS OF THE 1000--FOOT �GfNT�ERL/NE CURVE ;WOULD NO LONGER HAVE A ,�s'ADIUS OF 1000.00 fEET AND WOULD NAT 'ONFORM
<br /> CURIE AS SHOWN ON M& f? 7 33 WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ADJACENT G'ENTERLINE IO THE INTENT DF THE ORIGINAL F/N.4[ MAP.
<br /> AIVD�''0R ,EIGHT-OF WAY MONUMEIITATION SHOWN /IV THE PRORATION ,DETAIL; /'OWEt✓ER, THE
<br /> RECDfi'D i"-FOOT CENTEIi'LINE CURYf AS SHOWN ON M.& P 27 33 COULD NOT BE FIT (5) HOLD THE FOUND MONUMENTS' AS THE ACTUAL ENDPOINTS AND FIT A x!000-- 00T RADIUS
<br /> BETWEEN THE ENDPOINTS AS MONUMENMD. CURVE ro THESE MONUMENTS THIS SCENARIO HOLL75 THE /LATENT OF T7VE ORIGINAL SURVEY TRAG'T NO. 3248
<br /> AS MONUMENTED ON THE GROUND AND THE INTEIVT OF AN E.WN-f`OOT RADIUS CURVE. THE SUBDIVISIONS OF SAN J04OUIN COUNTY �,✓
<br /> 4.IN MY REVIEW OF POSSIBLE WAYS TO SOLVE THIS DIFFERENCE FROM RECORD / CAME UP DEVIATION FROM THE RECORD 1000-FOOT RADIUS �"ENTERLINE CURVE WILL BE "T TH£ �/ n ,n/� ,�• CJ�L 1�
<br /> WITH FIVE POSSIBLE METHODS CURVE WILL NOT BE TANGENT AT THE ;ENDPOINTS AND 0.37 FOOT LONGER. THIS METHOD ARCD ROAD (,�01VI ✓C
<br /> WAS ACCEPTED AND IMPLEMENTED ON THIS FINAL MAPP, BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 5 THRU 7 AND LOT 19 OF UNIT NO. i,
<br /> (1) HOLD THE EASTERL Y MONUMENT, LAYOUT THE RECORD CURVE AND SHOW THE ARCH ROAD INDUSTRIAL PARK, FILED FOR RECORD IN BOOK 27 OF MAPS & PLATS,
<br /> NORTHERL Y MONUMENT AS BEING OUT OF POSITION. THIS METHOD WAS REJECTED 5. WITH THE RESOLUTION OF THE CENTERLINE THROUGH THE CURVE, THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT- PAGE 33, SAN ✓OAOUIN COUNTY RECORDS, AND BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 60
<br /> ON THE BASIS THAT ALL THE MONUMENT LOCATIONS WERE CREATED EQUALLY OR OF-WAY LINE THROUGH THE CURVE WAS ESTABLISHED USING RECORD STREET WIDTHS AND OF THE C.M. WEBER GRANT AND A PORTION OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
<br /> SIMULTANEOUSLY By VIRTUE OF THEIR INCLUSION ON A FILED FINAL MAP AND ROUND CORNER RADIUS AS SHOWN ON M.& P. 27 33. THE CALCULATED LENGTH OF THE RANGE 7 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND .MERIDIAN, CITY OF STOCKTON,
<br /> THE MONUMENTS AGREE WITH OTHER FOUND ADJACENT MONUMENTATION OUTSIDE THE ESTABLISHED CURVE RIGHT-OF-WAY /S 1296.51 FEET VERSUS A RECORD LENGTH OF COUNTY OF SAN JOAOU/N, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
<br /> LIMITS OF THE CURVE. 1296.08 FEET AS SHOWN IN THE PRORATION DETAIL. THE LOT CORNER COMMON TO LOTS 4
<br /> AND 5 AS SHOWN ON M.& P. 27-33 WAS LOCATED BY PRORATION BASED UPON THE �`^ //�/ �/�/ /
<br /> (2) HOLD THE EASTERLY MONUMENT, LAYOUT THE RECORD CURVE AND EXTEND THE CURVE CALCULATED AND RECORD VALUES HERETOFORE LISTED. A.R. SA Y V UIl YETI/ & ASSOCIATES
<br /> TO THE INTERSECTION OF A RADIAL LINE BETWEEN THE FOUND NORTHERL Y MONUMENT
<br /> AND THE CENTER OF THE RECORD CURVE THIS METHOD WAS REJECTED FOR THE 6.NORMALLY PRORATION OCCURS BE7WEEN FOUND ORIGINAL MONUMENTS ALONG A LINE OR CONSULTING CIVIL. ENGNEDYS
<br /> SAME REASONS AS METHOD (1). CURVE. IN THIS INSTANCE NO FURTHER MONUMENTS WERE TO BE FOUND TO THE NORTH,
<br /> WHEREFORE INE CENTERLINE MONUMENTS WERE USED TO FORM THE BASIS OF THE STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
<br /> PRORATION.
<br /> NOVEMBER 2003
<br /> SHEET 7. WO OF FOUR SHEETS
<br /> D.D. SHEET NO 35
<br />
|