Laserfiche WebLink
*401 <br />was aerated under permit from the San Joaquin County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) and, <br />subsequent to verification of successful remediation through sampling of the stockpiled soil, was used <br />to backfill the excavation. The work was performed under the direction of the APCD and local fire <br />district after the San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Health Division <br />(PHS/EHD) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) indicated that their <br />oversight would not be provided. <br />FIELD METHODS <br />Ground Zero supervised the drilling of three soil borings (SBI, S132, and S133). SBI was advanced in <br />the vicinity of the former tanks and dispenser island. S132 and S133 were located progressively further <br />from SBI in the assumed downgradient direction, northeast of the former tanks. The location of the <br />borings are shown on Figure 2. Drilling was performed by V&W Drilling (C57-710678) under permit <br />from PHS/EHD. Ms. Linda Turkatte of PHS/EHD was present to observe field activities. <br />Boring S131 was initially drilled to approximately 20 feet below grade. Soil samples were collected at <br />five foot intervals beginning at 5.0 feet below grade for characterization purposes. Groundwater was <br />noted on the sampling shoe after driving the sampler to approximately 21.5 feet below grade. The <br />sample from the interval of 20.0 to 20.5 feet below grade was collected into a pre -washed brass tube, <br />sealed with teflon tape and plastic end caps, labelled, placed on ice, and transported under chain of <br />custody to Argon Laboratories (DHS -1873) in Ceres, California for analysis. Subsequent to soil <br />sampling, a discrete water sample was collected from SB1 using a Hydropunch II water sampler. The <br />water sample was collected by driving the Hydropunch II implement into the water table using a 140 - <br />pound drop hammer and allowing groundwater to flow into the screened portion of the sampler under <br />natural hydrostatic pressure. The water sample was collected using a pre -washed bailer into appropriate <br />containers. The sample was labelled, placed on ice, and transported to Argon Laboratories for analysis. <br />Hydrocarbon odors were noted in the soil sample collected at 20 feet below grade and in the water <br />sample collected from boring SB 1. A log of boring SB 1 is included in Attachment B. <br />Based upon the observed presence of hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater samples collected from SB 1, <br />Ground Zero advanced borings S132 and SB3 to collect soil and groundwater samples in the assumed <br />downgradient direction of groundwater flow, northeast of the former tanks. Due to time limitations and <br />per Ms. Turkatte's approval, lithologic logs were not compiled for borings S132 and S133. Sampling <br />intervals and brief descriptions of soils encountered are included in field boring logs, Attachment B. <br />S132 was located approximately 28 feet northeast of S131, and S133 was located approximately 17 feet <br />northeast of S132. One soil sample was collected from each boring at approximately 25.5 feet below <br />grade for laboratory analysis. Field evidence indicated that these samples were collected from the <br />capillary fringe zone, immediately above the water table. In addition, a water sample was collected <br />through the augers from boring S133 after advancing the boring an additional three feet to determine the <br />approximate extent of hydrocarbon impacts to groundwater in the assumed downgradient direction from <br />the former tanks. Only slight hydrocarbon odors were noted in soil samples collected from the capillary <br />fringe zone of borings S132 and S133. No odors were noted in the groundwater sample collected from <br />h:\"5 1\groundze\ranuio\ranuio. sum 2 <br />