Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB , January 2002 Page 6 of 7 <br /> 8 . FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING <br /> Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps <br /> Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested ❑ <br /> Test Method Developed By : ❑ Sump Manufacturer ❑ Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer <br /> ❑ Other (Sped) <br /> Test Method Used : ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum ❑ Hydrostatic <br /> ❑ Other (Spec) <br /> Test Equipment Used: INCON SUMP TESTER Equipment Resolution: 0 .002" <br /> Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Fill Sump # <br /> Sump Diameter : <br /> Sump Depth : <br /> Height fi•om Tank Top to Top of <br /> Highest Piping Penetration : <br /> Height from Tank Top to Lowest <br /> Electrical Penetration : <br /> Condition of sump prior to a <br /> testing : <br /> Portion of Sump Tested <br /> Sump Material : � r <br /> Wait time between applying <br /> pressure/vacuum/water and <br /> starting test: <br /> Test Start Time : <br /> Initial Reading (RI) : <br /> Test End Time : <br /> Final Reading (RF) : <br /> Test Duration: <br /> Change in Reading (RF-RI) : <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: +/- 0.002" +/- 0. 002" +/. 0.002" +/- 0 .002" <br /> Test Result. ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail <br /> Is there a sensor in the sump? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No <br /> Does the sensor alarm when <br /> either product or water is ❑ Yes ❑ No [:INA ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA <br /> detected? <br /> Was sensor removed for testing? ❑ Yes ❑ No [:INA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and <br /> verified functional after testing? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No [:INA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA <br /> Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and r•ecomnrended folloiti -tip for failed tests) <br />