My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011203
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREMONT
>
2050
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543791
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011203
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2018 4:01:30 AM
Creation date
9/28/2018 4:16:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011203
FileName_PostFix
XR0011203
RECORD_ID
PR0543791
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0003592
FACILITY_NAME
Aries Tek, LLC
STREET_NUMBER
2050
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
FREMONT
STREET_TYPE
St
City
Stockton
Zip
95205
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2050 E Fremont St
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
early in the quarter, resulted in significant volatilization of hydrocarbons that previously had not been <br /> recovered by the extraction unit However, it is uncertain whether the hydrocarbons were volatilized <br /> ' from groundwater or soil, because no groundwater samples had been collected from the deep well in <br /> prior quarters <br /> ' Comparison of the laboratory result (Appendix B) of the sample collected on January 2 with the PID <br /> reading on that date yields unsatisfactory correspondence When converted from parts per million by <br /> volume (ppmv) to parts per million by weight, the laboratory result of 1,033 ppm is more than 50% <br /> ' greater than the value of the PID reading of 620 ppm Similarly, the laboratory result of 20 ppm for the <br /> exhaust sample is 500% higher than the 4 ppm measured by the PID The daily PID readings may <br /> therefore be incorrect on the low side during the quarter If so, it implies that air sparging had an even <br /> greater effect than is indicated by the PID data <br /> 4.2 Weight of VOC's Destroyed <br /> ' Th6 weight of VOC's extracted during the quarter can be computed by using the average PID <br /> g g p <br /> concentration from Figure 5 and the cumulative volume of extracted vapors from Figure 4 <br /> tWEIGHT OF VOUS =CF x VAPOR x 10-6 x 100 moVwt <br /> ' 379 cf/mole <br /> =4 608 x 10� ft' x 970 x le x 100 moVwt <br /> 379 cf/mole <br /> =4 470 x 10 SIbs <br />' 379x102 <br /> = 1179 lbs <br /> 5.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br />' 5.1 Monitoring Procedures <br /> r <br />' Groundwater monitoring took place on February 20, 1996 The depth to groundwater was measured <br /> in all six monitoring wells and in the Aep vapor extraction well Depth measurements were recorded <br /> on the Well Monitor Report (Appendix C) Per prior agreement with San Joaquin County PHS/EHD, <br />' monitoring well MW-5 was purged of approximately 3 well volumes (3 gallons) before sampling, but <br /> none of the other wells were purged or sampled except the deep vapor extraction well Due to the <br /> minimal amount of water in that well and its slow recharge rate, however, VE-I was sampled without --- <br />'- purging The water purged from MW-5 was stored in a 55-gallon drum near the vapor extraction unit <br /> for later disposal <br /> 1 4 , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.