Laserfiche WebLink
Two 40-m1 sample vials were collected from MW-5 and VE-I and were labeled and placed in a cooled <br /> ice chest for later delivery to Sequoia Analytical in Sacramento The laboratory report and chain-of- <br /> custody form are included in Appendix B <br /> 5.2 Depth to Groundwater <br /> The normal seasonal rise in the water table was observed during the quarter (Table 1) As of February <br /> 20, it had risen approximately 3 feet from its December level and had reached an average depth of 58 5 <br /> feet <br /> 5.3 Groundwater Gradient and Flow Direction <br />' During the first two quarters of 1995, depth-to-groundwater measurements identified a central trough <br /> in the groundwater gradient centered in the vicinity of MW-5 In September, this trough disappeared <br /> ' and the gradient assumed a more planar form, with flow almost due east By December, the trough had <br /> returned, and was well developed when water depths were measured in February(Figure 6) <br /> 5.4 Groundwater Contamination <br /> As in the previous four quarters, contaminants were detected in MW-5 (Table 2) The benzene and <br /> ' TPH-g concentrations were virtually identical to those in December <br /> For the first time, a water sample from VE-1 was analyzed All BTEX compounds were detected and <br /> a relatively high gasoline concentration was reported As directed by PHSIEHD, the laboratory also <br /> analyzed the samples for the octane booster methyl-butyl-tertiary ether(MTBE), but none was present <br /> ' in the samples The values are suspect, however, because the sample was very turbid and had a"milky" <br /> appearance This suggests that degraded hydrocarbons may be preferentially concentrated near the <br /> extraction well, and the values might have been somewhat lower if it were possible to purge before <br /> ' sampling <br /> 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Approximately 4,608,404 cu ft of vapors were withdrawn and combusted between January 1 and <br /> ' March 31, 1996 VOC concentrations(as measured by PID) in the two-well vapor stream ranged from <br /> 355 ppm to 2,200 ppm during this period, and an overall increase in concentrations appears to have <br /> occurred The mean VOC concentration measured during the 12 monitoring events was 970 ppm, <br /> ' however, comparison of the PID and laboratory measurements on January 2 suggests that the <br /> measured PID concentrations may be too low Using the mean value, calculations indicate that 1179 <br /> pounds of hydrocarbons were destroyed <br /> Efforts to volatilize contaminants from the groundwater and improve the efficiency of the extraction <br /> system during the quarter have evidently been successful, and vapor concentrations measured with field <br /> equipment showed a sharp reversal from the previous downward trend We therefore recommend that <br /> 5 <br /> r <br />