My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
A
>
11
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543358
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2018 9:12:44 AM
Creation date
10/22/2018 8:47:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0543358
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005977
FACILITY_NAME
TRI VALLEY GROWERS PLANT K
STREET_NUMBER
11
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
A
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15304003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
11 S A ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC`"HEALTH SERVICES <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY r' <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION <br /> Ernest M. Fujimoto, M.D., M.P.H., Acting Health Officer <br /> 445 N. San Joaquin Street • P.O. Box 388 • Stockton, CA 95201-0388 <br /> (209) 468-3420 <br /> JUAN QUIJANO <br /> BOB BENNET <br /> TRI VALLEY GROWERS C (DFY <br /> P 0 BOX 1211 <br /> MODESTO CA 95353 <br /> MAR 14 199r, <br /> RE: 11 SOUTH A STREET SITE CODE: 2040 <br /> STOCKTON CA <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Health Division <br /> (PHSIEHD) has completed the review of the "Sampling Report - Soil Remediation <br /> Proposal" dated January 26, 1995, and has the following comments for your <br /> consideration. <br /> The laboratory results for the soil sampling from the last phase of field work <br /> contained no quality control/quality assurance data. Without this information, the <br /> accuracy and/or precision of the results cannot be evaluated. Quality control/quality <br /> assurance data must be submitted with the laboratory results. In addition, the date <br /> on the laboratory results is 15 days from the date of sample collection. Soil samples <br /> must be analyzed within 14 days from the date of collection. <br /> The evaluation of the remedial alternatives at this site failed to adequately provide for <br /> the costs of implementing the alternatives. The costs to be reported in the remedial <br /> plan must be broken down into unit costs for the work specific for this site. <br /> PHSIEHD has identified the following potential problems with the proposed bucket <br /> auger method of excavation: <br /> Any attempt to remove the pea gravel fill from a 30 inch by 72 inch area may <br /> result in the intrusion of the remainder of pea gravel in the former tank pit into <br /> the excavation. <br /> The proposal does not indicate how confirmation soil samples would be <br /> obtained. It appears from the description of bucket augering that it would be <br /> difficult to obtain undisturbed soil samples. <br /> Any remaining soil contamination proposed to be left behind must be <br /> A Division or San.ioaquin County Health Care Services <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.