Laserfiche WebLink
f <br /> it <br /> JUAN QUIJANO i <br /> BOB BENNETT a' <br /> j PAGE 2 <br /> characterized for mass volume (additional soil sampling) and evaluated for future <br /> threat tog roundwater by some form of fate and transport modelling. Should the <br /> { modelling indicate groundwater may be impacted in the future, additional cleanup <br /> and/or groundwater monitoring may be required. Given the uncertainty of the <br /> effectiveness of this alternative, these extra potential costs must be considered and <br /> evaluated against the other alternatives being considered. Depending on the levels <br /> of contamination proposed to be left behind, this alternative may not prove to be the <br /> most efficient, cost effective alternative. <br /> Therefore, please submit an addendum to the reme�diatlon proposal to address <br /> the concerns noted above and to discuss in more detail the site specific costs <br /> for each alternative being evaluated to PHS/EHD by April 28, 1995. s <br /> If you have an questions regarding this letter, please �contact Linda Turkatte, Senior <br /> Y any g 9 , <br /> REHS, at (209) 468-3441. <br /> Donna Heran, REHS, Director <br /> 11. <br /> Environmental Health Division !I <br /> j? <br /> 'i <br /> y;y <br /> Linda A. Turkatte, Senior REHS . Dianei' H-riins.on., R S <br /> Site Mitigation Unit f'I-Supervisor <br /> LT <br /> �t <br /> i <br /> C' CVRWQCB, Beth Thayer <br /> c: Custom Food Machinery, Ron McNeil Sr <br /> it <br /> i� <br /> g . .I <br />