Laserfiche WebLink
4N, i 10 <br /> i <br /> 1 facility was in compliance . Okay , Okay . In 1992, this <br /> 2 is May of ' 92, a closure plan was submitted for the <br /> I, <br /> 3 three underground tanks , which means a plan was <br /> 4 submitted to the County for removal of the tanks , , <br /> 5 Q . Okay , Not as a requirement of the County? <br /> ( <br /> r <br /> 6 A . Not to my knowledge;I . This was a lot of <br /> 1 <br /> 7 the -- <br /> 1� <br /> 8 As I was saying earlier, in 1987 some new f <br /> 9 laws were enacted and at that time it was pretty well <br /> 10 common knowledge that all single—walled metal tanks <br /> !a <br /> 11 would need to be removed in thel, Stote of California by <br /> '12 1998 and so that was probably voluntary on their part to <br /> 13 the point that they wanted to g0 ahead and da that at <br /> 14 this time . <br /> I � <br /> it <br /> F 15 Q . Okay . Who submitted the plan? <br /> 16 A . I am sure it was Save—Mor Oil Company . <br /> 17 Q . In the plan, do they give any reason for the <br /> 18 removal of the tanks? <br /> Ir <br /> 19 A . leo . Usually they do not . To my knowledge, <br /> 20 they did not give any . I don ' t have the actual plan <br /> 21 with me, but to my knowledge, usually they do not give <br /> IIt <br /> 22 any reason . They lust want to -get the single—walled <br /> 'f <br /> 23 tanks out of the ground . j1 <br /> 'a <br /> _L{ 24 We routinely sample,;beneath the tanks to see <br /> lli25 if there ' s any problem . And tomy knowledge, there was <br /> I�. iP <br /> It <br /> j i�l <br /> II <br /> PORTALS & ASSOCIATES (209 ) 462-3377 <br />