Laserfiche WebLink
+ 1 no reason to believe . there was '`a problem beneath the <br /> r <br /> 2 tanks prior to removal . They were Just routinely <br /> �i <br /> 3 getting the tanks out . Becouse� of .the law that was <br /> i <br /> 4 enacted, the tanks had to be removed by 1998 . <br /> I� <br /> 5 Q . Okay . You really don ' t know what the reason <br />{ I <br /> 6 was why they wanted the tanks removed, correct? <br /> 7 A . Pardon? <br /> 8 Q . You really dont know the reason why <br /> 9 Save-Mor wanted the tanks removed? <br /> 10 -A . I don ' t know if there was a reason other <br /> 11 than lust the law . <br /> .12 Q . One thing that I should have mentioned <br /> F I� <br /> 13 earlier, if you don ' t know an answer to one of my # <br /> t <br /> 14 questions, that ' s okay . .dust tell me that you don ' t <br /> 15 know . I really don ' t want you to guess at something if <br /> 16 it ' s guessing on your behalf about why they wanted to <br /> i� <br /> 17 remove the tanks , for instanceA because the law required <br /> 18 them to move remove them before 1998 . It would Just <br /> 19 simply be better if you tell mei,, that you don ' t know . <br /> r 20 And I would appreciate that youdon ' t make any guesses <br /> E 21 because I Just want your accurate testimony about what <br /> 22 you do know . I. <br /> 23 A . Okay . <br /> r 24 Q . At some point, I understand that there had <br /> 25 been some contamination discove'red during the removal of <br /> 6 <br /> PORTALE & ASSOCIATES ;t(209 ) 462-3377 <br />