Laserfiche WebLink
!: 24 <br /> 1 that turned out to have only minor contamination . Do <br /> 2 you mean that it does not necessarily have some <br /> 3 consistency between soil discoloration and whether or <br /> 4 not there is actual contamination or significant levels <br /> 5 of contamination? <br /> i 6 MR . PAPAS : Okay . You are talking in <br /> 7 general, not lust in reference to that? <br /> 8 MR . HASTINGS : Q . Yes, just in <br /> 9 general . To me it seems odd that the one tank that you <br /> 10 thought had minor contamination was the only one he <br /> 11 noted soil discoloration . <br /> -12 A . Do I find it unusual? I would say, yes , I <br /> I� <br /> .13 find it unusual but not impossible . It happens . <br /> 14 Q . Okay . So unusual but not necessarily of any <br /> V <br /> 'j <br /> 15 significance? <br /> f <br /> 16 A . Right . <br /> h <br /> 17 Q . Okay . And apparently sometime around <br /> E <br /> 3 <br /> 18 September 12th that -- if I am guessing the 30-day <br /> 19 period of the notice to the public regarding public <br /> 20 participation expired? <br /> 21 A . The over-excavation of the soil was <br /> 22 scheduled for September the 28th . That was done on <br /> i <br /> 23 September the 15th at the end of the public <br /> r <br /> 24 participation . <br /> Ifi 3 <br /> II <br /> a 25 Q . I ' m sorry . Originally scheduled for <br /> I� <br /> PORTALS & ASSOCIATESI ( 209 ) 462-3377 <br />