Laserfiche WebLink
25 <br /> F 1 September 8th? <br /> r <br /> �r <br /> 2 A . September 28th . Ir <br /> 3 Q . Okay . And when wasiit actually performed? <br /> 4 A . September the 28thA <br /> 5 Q . Oh, so the same day� it was scheduled for? <br /> 6 A . Yes . jy <br /> 7 Q . And how far did they over excavate the hole? <br /> I� <br /> 8 A . Approximately 200 cubic yards of soil was <br /> 9 excavated at that time to 22 feet deep . I was there an <br /> 10 site . There were still -- there was still noticeable <br /> i' <br /> 11 contamination visually and odor, so the excavation was <br /> -12 stopped at that point, at 22 feet, in order for them to <br /> Er, <br /> I3 regroup, you might say . It was more extensive than it <br /> 14 was previously thought to be . <br /> 15 Q . Okay . So was it previously planned that the <br /> 15 excavation would go to 22 feet "and that --- I don ' t know <br /> 17 if hopeful was the right word, but the expectation <br /> 18 anticipated at least that that ;should be a sufficient <br /> { 19 enough over-excavation initially? <br /> 20 MR . PAPAS : Ob;ject. to the question on <br /> 21 the ground it is vague and ambiguous . <br /> 22 Go head . { <br /> i <br /> 23 MR , HASTINGS : Q . what was the <br /> 1 <br /> 24 original work plan? what depth' did the excavation of <br /> 25 the work plan provide for? : <br /> E <br /> PORTALS & ASSOCIATESIj (209 ) 462-3377 <br /> _ .J <br />