Laserfiche WebLink
- - 36 <br /> �~1 <br /> MR . HASTINGS : jt Q . Looking at it from 1 <br /> L; <br /> 2 the top down, it was within five to ten feet off the <br /> { <br /> 4 3 original location? In other words, you wouldn ' t -- if <br /> I� <br /> 4 the original detection, for example, this one is noted <br /> 5 by number one, which I guess was sample number one, <br /> 11 <br /> 6 which is detected 1300 parts peer million of the -- <br /> 7 whatever that was , it wouldn ' t rake sense when you find <br /> 8 out if your floor ' s clean at 30feet, if you take it <br /> 9 over in the lower right--hand corner? <br /> I' <br /> 10 A. Correct . <br /> i <br /> 11 Q . So you take it within the approximately some <br /> f <br /> 12location as the original sample? <br /> 13 A . Correct , <br /> 14 Q . Okay . Then I gueW at some point you were <br /> 15 satisfied that the hole what, is clean? <br /> t <br /> 16 A . That ' s correct . <br /> 17 Q . Okay . Can you tell � me when that was? <br /> I� <br /> 18 A . December the 8th, 1992 . <br /> i <br /> x <br /> s 19 Q . Okay . And is there some document in your <br /> 20 file that refers to that or just your note? <br /> .21 A . Just the notes , Also, I spoke with the <br /> 9 <br /> 22 other inspector on site, Harlan Knoll, in the office <br /> 23 regarding the lab results that were fax 'd on that day to <br /> 24 us , and I have a notation in the file that he concurred, <br /> I <br /> 25 also . <br /> I� <br /> P <br /> I� <br /> PORTALE & ASSOCIATES :,(209 ) 462-3377 <br />