Laserfiche WebLink
35 <br /> 4 ' 1 is that correct? k <br /> 2 A . Could you repeat that? <br /> { 3 Q . Looking at it vertically, then the floor <br /> 4 samples that turned out to be n�ondetect were taken <br /> 5 within roughly a 15-foot radius° of the original location <br /> 6 of the samples that had the detections? <br /> l <br /> 7 MR . PAPAS : We-11, I ' ll object to the <br /> 8 extent that it calls for speculation . <br /> 9 If you can tell based upon looking at that <br /> ii <br /> 10 diagram or else the recollection that you have to answer <br /> 11 it . <br /> I <br /> 12 THE WITNESS : The original samples were <br /> 13 taken at 14 feet . You are referring to them, correct, <br /> 14 beneath tanks? <br /> 15 Q . Yes . <br /> 16 A . And the question wa11 if the bottom samples <br /> � <br /> 17 were taken within a radius of 15 feet of that? <br /> 18 Q . Vertical radius . <br /> 19 A . Vertical . There would be a slight <br /> 20 horizontal component of five orIten feet, but Yes . I <br /> 21 don ' t see any problem with that3. <br /> I <br /> 22 Q . Actually, you can -1 I guess it would be a <br /> horizontal radius wouldn ' t it <br /> 23 z .,�J <br /> 24 MR . PAPAS : That ' s what I was <br /> 25 wondering . <br /> a <br /> PORTALE & ASSOCIATESI (209 ) 462-3377 <br />