My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AIRPORT
>
2651
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543371
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2018 3:20:25 PM
Creation date
10/23/2018 11:39:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0543371
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006174
FACILITY_NAME
Best Express Foods Inc.
STREET_NUMBER
2651
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AIRPORT
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16912003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2651 S AIRPORT WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
455
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 4 <br />S. <br />Vicki McCartney [EH] <br />From: . Anderson, Paul (PSC) [PAndersoh@pscnow.com] <br />Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 1:31 PM <br />To: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br />Cc: Carrow, John (PSC) <br />Subject: RE: GW Monitoring Reduction Request Letter- Global ID #T0607700044, Case #19093, Sara Lee <br />2651 South Airport Way, Stockton <br />Vicki, <br />Thank you for the quick reply. <br />The event was scheduled for next week. <br />Therefore, I can and will cancel the event as soon as I hit Send on this email <br />I will forward our email correspondence to John Carrow and next week John and I will evaluate <br />the results of the models. <br />I assume we would need the soil vapor intrusion survey as part of the risk assessment. <br />The question of installing the well and potential for residual contamination remediation may be <br />determined on the results of the models. <br />It would probably be best if we can discuss the results of the evaluation prior to Nuel finalizing <br />the letter at his convenience. <br />Thank you very much. <br />Hope you have a nice weekend. <br />Pahl Anderson <br />From: Vicki McCartney [EH] [mailto:vmccprtney@sjcehd.com] <br />Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 3:21 PM <br />To: Anderson, Paul (PSC) . <br />Subject: RE: GW Monitoring Reduction Request Letter - Global ID #T0607700044, Case #19093, Sara Lee 2651 <br />South Airport Way, Stockton <br />Paul: <br />Is it too late to cancel the sampling event scheduled for the third quarter? I really don't think we need to sample <br />the wells again this year. <br />I can not comment concerning the switch to performing a risk assessment evaluation. It was Nuel's decision to <br />install a deep well, and Nuel also agreed that a feasibility study was appropriate. These are decisions only Nuel <br />can make after he returns and based on Nuel's workload, I `doubt he will be able to comment for some time. <br />Vicki McCartney, Senior REHS <br />San Joaquin County <br />Environmental Health Department <br />600 East Main Street <br />Stockton, California 95202 <br />Phone: (209) 468-9852 <br />Fax: (209) 468-3433 <br />Email: vmccartne (v ivsicelid.com <br />7/10/2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.