Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE II <br /> Analytical Laboratory Results <br /> Sample TPI1 Bc uzcne Toluene F—Benzene Xylenes Total Lead <br /> MW-1 (>5?J g 6 3 SS ti 6A $1210 ND <br /> MW-2 02(g 87 2.2 103 ND <br /> MW-3 ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> ---- ---- --- <br /> MW-5 --- ---- --- ---- - <br /> MW-6 ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> MW 7 --- --- <br /> MW 8 ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> asNIA 1 2000 680 1750 50 <br /> NOTES <br /> • TPi-1 Total petroleum liydrocarbons analwed per method 8015 modified/purge and trap Results are reported in parts per million(ppm) <br /> Detection limit = 0 1 ppm for gasoline(g), 0 2 ppm for diesel fuel (d)and 0 5 ppm for motor oil (mo) <br /> • Benzene toluene,ethyl benzene,and total svlenes Aromatic volatile organics analyzed per EPA Method 602 Results are reported in parts <br /> per billion (ppb) Detection limit = 0 5 ppb <br /> • Total lead Analyzed per EPA method 6010 Results are reported in parts per million (ppm) Detection limit � 0 05 ppm <br /> • ND Not detected <br /> • NS Not sampled <br /> • NIA Not applicable <br /> • MCL Maximum Contaminant Levels(MCL s)in parts per hilLon(ppb)per the Sime of California Regionel Water Quality Cattrol Boards <br /> A Compilation of Water Quality Goals,November 1989 An MCL for total pttrolcum hydrocarbons has not been esiablishcd <br /> • MW-4, MW 5 and MW-7 could not be sampled due to the lack of groundyyater in the sells <br /> DISPOSITION OF PURGED WELL WATER <br /> Groundwater purged from the monitoring wells prior to sampling was containerized in a 55-gallon drum <br /> and stored on the site Following receipt of the analytical data, Ramos Environmental Services of West <br /> Sacramento collected and disposed of the purged well water on 12 May 1992 as a non-RCRA, hazardous <br /> liquid waste under Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest number 90382817 <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> The following conclusions are based on data obtained the current and past samplings Figure 2 <br /> illustrates the locations of the wells and their corresponding contaminant concentrations <br /> • The direction of the local groundwater gradient was calculated to be toward the <br /> east/northeast during this current sampling This corresponds to the groundwater <br /> gradient direction calculated for prior samplings <br /> • MW-1, located in the center of the prior tank cluster, had detecable levels of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons, similar to prior samplings <br /> • MW-2, located just south of the prior tank cluster, had low levels of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons This contrasts with prior samplings, in which no petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons were detected in this well <br /> ANDERSON <br /> N , CONSULTING <br /> V GROUP <br />