My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AIRPORT
>
8010
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0526994
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2018 2:39:18 PM
Creation date
10/24/2018 11:49:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0526994
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0018291
FACILITY_NAME
FMS #24 (OMS)
STREET_NUMBER
8010
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AIRPORT
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17726029
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
8010 S AIRPORT WAY
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Treatability Study Report and Feasibility Evaluation for <br />In Situ Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation <br />Field Maintenance Shop #24, 8020 South Airport Way <br />Stockton, California <br />indicated in Figure 3. The borings were placed further from the former UST locations relative to <br />previous borings to help define the lateral extent of contamination. Soil, soil gas, and <br />groundwater grab samples were analyzed by the on-site lab for BTEX and TPH-g/TPH-d <br />compounds. Direct -push shallow soil gas samples were collected at 8 feet bgs adjacent to four <br />buildings in the vicinity of the USTs, to determine whether a potential health risk exists to <br />workers within the buildings. No constituents of concern were detected in the October 2007 soil <br />samples; however, TPH-g, TPH-d, BTEX constituents, and select chlorinated VOCs were <br />detected in groundwater at concentrations exceeding applicable regulatory standards <br />(URS, 2007). Based on results from the two phases of investigation in 2007, URS concluded <br />that the UST source contamination had reached groundwater and the contamination plume has <br />migrated northeast, but has not extended to the facility boundary (URS, 2007). The report <br />further concluded that the lateral extent of contamination at the former UST site had been <br />determined. <br />The site investigation conducted by OTIE in March 2010 included advancing five soil borings <br />that were subsequently converted to groundwater monitoring wells (FMS-MW1 to FMS-MW5; <br />Figure 3). The borings were advanced using HSA and soil samples were collected at <br />approximately 5 -foot intervals and analyzed for TPH-g, TPH-d, VOCs including BTEX and fuel <br />oxygenates, and total lead. Groundwater samples collected from the monitoring wells after <br />installation and development were analyzed for TPH-g, TPH-d, and VOCs including BTEX and <br />fuel oxygenates. <br />The key findings associated with implementation of the 2010 investigation were.. <br />• Physical soil conditions were shown to be generally consistent with the findings from <br />previous site investigations, as documented in the 2004 Versar and 2007 URS reports, and <br />indicate that the shallow first water bearing zone (35-40 feet bgs) is dominated by <br />interbedded sand units within fat clays and silty/sandy clays. <br />• Although trace concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbon constituents and/or select VOCs <br />were detected intermittently in samples from soil borings for each of the groundwater <br />monitoring wells, only soil samples from the boring for well FMS-MW5 (within the immediate <br />vicinity of the former USTs) indicated marked impacts from petroleum hydrocarbons. <br />• The most significant impacts from petroleum hydrocarbon constituents documented in soil <br />samples from the boring for well FMS-MW5 (160 mg/kg TPH-g at 30 feet) were generally in <br />samples at or near the occurrence of first groundwater (30-45 feet bgs), and included <br />exceedances of potentially applicable regulatory standards for TPH-d, TPH-g, benzene, <br />and/or ethylbenzene. <br />• Groundwater elevations resulting from surveyed well datum elevations indicate that the <br />generally east/northeast direction of groundwater flow presumed in the 2007 URS report is <br />correct, that the gradient is relatively low (0.0015), and that no evidence of separate phase <br />hydrocarbons (SPH) exists on the groundwater. <br />• Groundwater samples collected during the first monitoring event following well installation <br />indicate that groundwater has been impacted with petroleum hydrocarbon constituents and <br />related VOCs at concentrations that exceed potentially applicable regulatory standards. <br />Subsequent groundwater monitoring performed by OTIE for Second Quarter 2010, Third <br />Quarter 2010, and First Quarter 2011, as described above, confirmed that the overall direction <br />of groundwater flow at the site is generally northeasterly, with a relatively flat gradient. No <br />OTIE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.