Laserfiche WebLink
Treatability Study Report and Feasibility Evaluation for <br />In Situ Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation <br />Field Maintenance Shop #24, 8020 South Airport Way <br />Stockton, California <br />2.2.1. Soil Vapor Extraction Well <br />Well SVE-1 was installed in the target area using 10'/4 -inch -diameter augers to a depth of <br />approximately 29 feet bgs, and constructed of 4 -inch schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) <br />casing. The well was screened across the vadose zone from approximately 18.5 to 28.5 feet <br />bgs using 0.020 -slot schedule 40 PVC screen. Construction details for SVE-1 are presented in <br />Table 1. Based on field observations during the installation of groundwater monitoring well <br />FMS-MW5, it was determined that the petroleum hydrocarbon -impacted screened interval is <br />characterized by the most coarse-grained, sandy material, which provides the most suitable <br />conditions for SVE implementation. <br />The wellbore for SVE-1 was backfilled with a filter pack of #2/12 silica sand. The filter pack was <br />sealed with 5 feet of hydrated bentonite chips or pellets. A bentonite/cement grout was placed <br />above the bentonite seal from approximately 2 to 11.5 feet bgs. The well was fitted with a <br />lockable, water tight well cap, and completed with a 12 -inch -diameter flush mount, traffic -rated <br />well vault set in concrete with positive drainage to facilitate conveyance of surface water runoff <br />away from the well vault. These construction details are indicated in the soil borings and well <br />completion logs presented in Appendix B. <br />It is noted that the location of SVE-1 is not consistent with the location identified in the Work <br />Plan (i.e., within the approximate outline of the former diesel UST). OTIE attempted to complete <br />the well at six locations in the immediate vicinity of the former diesel UST, but encountered what <br />appeared to be a concrete slab, presumably related to the former diesel UST footings, at <br />approximately 12 feet bgs at each of those locations. It was ultimately necessary to move the <br />location to the west, within the approximate outline of the former gasoline UST, as shown in <br />Figure 3, in order to complete the well. <br />2.2.2. Dual -Nested Air Sparge Well <br />The dual -nested AS wells (AS -1A/1 B) were installed approximately 15 feet northeast of SVE-1, <br />using 10'/4 -inch -diameter augers (Figure 3). Each of the wells was constructed using 2 -inch <br />schedule 80 PVC blank casing and 0.020 slot schedule 80 PVC screen, with a 2 -foot blank <br />casing sump at the base of each. Well AS -1A was screened within the upper portion of the <br />saturated zone, at a depth of approximately 37-39 feet bgs. Well AS -1 B was screened at a <br />depth interval of approximately 64-66 feet bgs. Details for these wells are presented in Table 1, <br />and on the boring log and well completion diagrams presented in Appendix B. The purpose of <br />installing the nested wells was to conserve costs associated with drilling an additional borehole. <br />OTIE actually considered constructing a triple -nested set of wells (in combination with SVE-1), <br />but was advised by SJCEHD that because of the department's requirement for over-drilling <br />when abandoning wells, it would be more practical to construct the three wells in two borings. <br />The wellbores for the nested AS wells were backfilled with a filter pack of #2/12 silica sand. The <br />filter pack will be sealed with 5 feet of hydrated bentonite chips or pellets. A bentonite/cement <br />grout was placed above each seal to the bottom of the next filter pack (2 to 31 feet bgs in each <br />well). The nested wells were fitted with a lockable, water tight well cap, and completed with a <br />12 -inch -diameter flush mount, traffic -rated well vault set in concrete with positive drainage to <br />facilitate conveyance of surface water runoff away from the well vault. <br />2.2.3. Dual Phase Extraction / Monitoring Wells <br />Wells FMS-DPE1 and FMS-DPE2) were installed for purposes of evaluating HVDPE as a <br />remedial technology (Figure 3). FMS-DPE1 was installed in the central area of the contaminant <br />plume, based on historical investigation data for the site, and FMS-DPE2 was installed <br />OTIE 10 <br />