ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012542 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

7, 7 V 7 1Z rV1 Z 4- pz 'V of the tank under Chain-of-Cu5tcldY by UanoniL- Laboratory pQrsonel, 7; (Exhibit F,) with instructions to be analyzed -For 5TX&E, TPH-s, EDD, and organic lead, as required by the SJLHD. Because of the fact that the tank was immediately adjacent to the pumas, (PlatP-- VII & V1110 no sample was taken on the fill line- The tank removal and sampling d by Jaime Favla csp?) of the SJLHD� Approximately 14 was witnesse cubic yards a{ no4l was removed frQm the excavation; after the tank was pulled, and samples taken, the -,oil was returnod to the hole. Approximately 7 cubic yards of clean fill was added to replace the volume occupied by the removed tank, and t110 site was returned to grade the same day. RESULTS OF SAMPLE ANALYSIS The results of the &aboratory anly:;is performed on the above samples are tabulated on Table 1� All tested components from the sample at the south end of the tank were below reporting limits; very minor amounts o-C Ethylbenzwne, Xylene, and TPH were detected in the namPle from the north end of the tank. On October 7, 1989, Jim Thorpe Oil, Inc. wrote to the CRW12CR, stating that the small amount of contamination in t�hu suil sample yv did not warrant further site investigation, and requested that the owners be relieved of any further work at the location; (refer to It Of telephone co"v1dr--ationsi between Richard Exhibit F. ) A5 a re!—ipr ade.theCRWQCB, a sample was taken from the Thorpe and Thomas Pelt domestic water well on the property, (refer to Plate V10 by Dr_ JohnBar-tell of McLaren Fnvironmental and analyzed for- BTX&E* TPN-,G, EDB, and organic lead. The results revealed that all components were below reporting limits; table 11 lists the results in tabular form- pLUMr- SIZE AND CONFIGURATION; The. writer did net witness the removal of the- tank, but it was reported that no discoloration of soil &:a5 noted- it appears that only a minor amount of spillage E)Qcurr-..d, and that a PIUML as such did not exist at -this loca+ian. ESTIMATE OF AMOUNT OF PRODUCT LEAKAGE: The owners of the property are deceased, and to the Writer's knowledge, there are no record available with v,!�)irh to determine the amount of fuel used during the time the tank was in place, or tu esfimate any spillage that I-ilay have occurred. because the tank was in excellent condition when removed, and QQ evidence of leakage of- soil discoloration was; noted, it can he assumed that any prciduct leakage Was of a very minor amount. As shown on Plates VI, VII ps. V111, the pumps were located immediately "jacent to the driveway_ It is moI7,t likely that any Spills that might have OLCUrr-1 Would ............... 2:1 13 k....s..'7777777777777 r