Laserfiche WebLink
Soil samples were collected from two depths in each of the monitor well bonngs based on the <br /> results of volatile organic compound screening of all samples collected These samples were <br />' submitted to the California certified WESTON Analytics' laboratory in Stockton, California, for <br /> analysis of TPH-G by Method 8015M and for BTEX by EPA Method 8020 The analytical <br /> results for these samples indicate that there were no detectable TPH-G or BTEX compounds in <br />' any of the six soil samples The complete analytical reports for these samples are also presented <br /> in Appendix D <br />' A 750-gallon plastic tank was placed on the site for temporary storage of monitor well <br /> development water and equipment decontamination nnsate The tank is located in the <br /> northwestern part of the site behind the former gas station office building and will also be used <br />' to accumulate purge waters from future quarterly sampling events Water stored in this tank will <br /> be characterized and disposed through proper channels at the completion of this project or when <br />' the tank is full. <br /> 3.1.3 Conclusions from the Results of the Third Quarter Activities <br />' From the combination of the results of the well installation program, the soil remediation <br /> preparatory work and the third quarter monitoring event, the following conclusions can be <br />' derived for the site <br /> o Hydrocarbon presence in the in-place soils at the site appear to be confined to the <br /> southwest corner of the bottom of the tank excavation area No hydrocarbon presence <br /> was found in the excavation sidewalls nor was it found in any of the pipeline trenches <br /> 0 <br /> I Hydrocarbon presence in the previously stockpiled soils is not detectable in at least the <br /> first 1'/a feet of the outside surface of the irregular-shaped pile Conditions deeper within <br /> the core of the pile are still unknown <br /> I0 The only hydrocarbon compound presence currently found in groundwater is TPH-G at <br /> very low concentrations in MW-3 and benzene in MW-2 and MW-5 The relationship <br /> between the two wells is consistent chemically and hydrogeologically as MW-5 is <br /> downgradient of MW-2 The concentration of benzene at the downgradient property line <br /> is 6 5 µg/L <br /> This data suggests that the remedial plan previously submitted for the site be revised to reflect <br /> the implications of the current data <br /> 3.2 Revised Remedial Plan <br /> The original soil remedial plan for the site consisted primarily of placing the previously <br /> stockpiled soils from the tank excavation area back in the excavation and installing a SVE system <br /> to treat the stockpiled soils as well as remaining in-place soils showing elevated hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations Because of the current data developed by the September and October 1992 soil <br /> and groundwater evaluation work, this plan now appears not to be the most efficient course of <br /> I action As discussed previously, hydrocarbon compounds are currently present only in one <br /> corner of the bottom of the excavation and are not present at all in the exterior portion of the <br /> ti <br />' nXC\Rp{SSAREG3QTR WA 10 11713M <br />