Laserfiche WebLink
California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> vCentral Valley Region <br /> Terry Tamminen <br /> Robert Schneider Chair <br /> Secretary for Sacramento Main Office Arnold Schwaraenegger <br /> Environmental Internet Address: http://www.su cb.ca.gov/rwgcb5 cfjovernorr <br /> F <br /> Protection 11020 Sun Center Drive#200 Rancho Cordova,CA 95670-6114 <br /> Phone(916)464-3291 Pak(916)464-4797 y> <br /> -1 <br /> 21 May 2004 <br /> 3 <br /> Ronald A. Burt ryym, <br /> Patterson Planning& Services, Inc. <br /> 4525 West End Avenue, Suite 215 <br /> Nashville, TN 37205 <br /> REVIEW OF REPORTS, KEARNEY KPF, 1624 EAST ALPINE AVENUE, STOCKTON, <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Staff of the Central Valley Regional Quality Control Board (Regional Board) has reviewed the <br /> February 2004 2003 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report(Annual Report) and the 30 April 2004 <br /> Review of First Quarter Monitoring Activities (Status Report) submitted by Dudek &Associates, Inc. on <br /> behalf of Kearney-National, Inc. (Kearney) for the Kearney-KPF facility at 1624 East Alpine Avenue in <br /> Stockton (site). The Annual Report discusses the groundwater monitoring activities conducted in <br /> November and trends observed in 2003, and summarizes the status of the pump and treat remedial <br /> system, operation and maintenance performed on the system, and releases from the system during 2003. <br /> The Status Report describes the monthly sampling of the remedial system as required by Monitoring and <br /> Reporting Program No. 5-01-269, Revision 2 (MRP) and water level measurement and sampling <br /> activities conducted in February. The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) may provide <br /> comments on these reports under separate cover. <br /> We have the following comments on the Annual and Status Reports: <br /> 1. The Annual Report does not include a discussion of the beneficial uses of the shallow water <br /> bearing zone. Kearney needs to include this information. <br /> 2. The detection limits for 1,2-dichlorothene, tetrachloroethene, and 1,1,2-trichloroethane are above <br /> 0.5 micrograms per liter, which is the maximum method detection limit allowed by Effluent <br /> Limitations C.2 of Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 5-01-269 and Table 2 of the MRP. <br /> The practical quantitation limits should be verified with Department of Health Services Division <br /> of Drinking Water and Environmental Management and Policy for Implementation of Toxics <br /> Standards for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California lists. These <br /> lists can be found at: <br /> www.dhs.ca.gov/ps/ddwem/publications/download/storlist.xls <br /> www.swrcb.ca.gov/iswp/final.pdf <br /> 3. Some of the graphs provided in Appendices B and C of the Annual Report are difficult to read <br /> due to all of the data points shown. Kearney should either provide these graphs in color or divide <br /> the information into separate graphs. <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> poi Recycled Paper <br />