Laserfiche WebLink
The District was invited to participate in the investigation. This was the <br /> District's first formal complaint df odors from Spreckels. <br /> on the morning of April 27, 1977, Richard Johnson and Jerry Vnite of the <br /> Air Resources Board, Larry Nash of the California Regional `dater Quality <br /> Control Board and Joe Spano of the San Joaquin County Air Pollution Control <br /> District met with Stewart Anderson, David Voit, and Frank Nelson of Spreckels <br /> Sugar. The Spreckels representatives discussed three potential sources of <br /> odor: the beet pulp driers, the cattle feedlot, and the wastewater ponds. <br /> They stated that the odor from the beet pulp drier was a generally unobjection— <br /> able odor similar to the odor of a baked potato. They explained that the <br /> feeding of beet resid=9 to cattle traded the odor which would occur if the <br /> beet residue were merely piled on the property and left to decay for the <br /> less objectional odor of a small feedlot. They also explained the waste— <br /> water ponding ca,_-,iSJ1' tie3, the water flow pattern through the ponds, the <br /> methods used fo aerating the ponds, and the program of using the water to <br /> irrigate orchard and field crops as a final disposal method. They also <br /> explained that Spreckels opposed development of property adjacent to the <br /> company's prcperty, thereby precipitating the odor complaints as a retaliatory <br /> tactic. <br /> The group toured the cattle feeding area and the wastewater ponding area. <br /> The Spreckels representatives pointed out an area to the north of the ponds <br /> which had previously been used as a cattle feed lot but which was scheduled <br /> for grading to provide fill dirt to be used in the construction of some new <br /> wastewater ponds thereby leaving the old cattle feed lot area to be used as a <br /> forage crop growing area. The new pond construction area was the present <br /> (9) <br />