Laserfiche WebLink
0 0 <br />ORDER NO. R5-2006-0054 -13- <br />INDIVIDUAL <br />13 - <br />INDIVIDUAL DISCHARGER CONDITIONAL. WAIVER OF <br />WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS <br />FOR DISCHARGES FROM IRRIGATED LANDS <br />58. This Order is not a new project that requires preparation of any new environmental <br />documents to comply with CEQA. It is a renewal of an existing project, with modifications. <br />These findings, nevertheless, evaluate whether a subsequent environmental document is <br />required. Public Resource Code section 21166 and Title 14 California Code of Regulations <br />section 15162 (CEQA Guidelines) specifies that when the lead agency has adopted a <br />negative declaration for a project, the agency is not required to prepare a subsequent <br />environmental document unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial <br />evidence in the light of the whole record, that, in summary: 1) substantial changes are <br />proposed in the project that involve new significant environmental impacts; 2) substantial <br />changes occur with respect to the circumstances of the project; or 3) new information of <br />substantial importance which was not previously known shows that the project will have <br />significant effects. None of the circumstances requiring preparation of subsequent <br />environmental document has occurred. <br />59. The project is the renewal of Conditional Waivers originally adopted in 2003; it is not a new <br />project. Substantial changes are not proposed in the project or with respect to the <br />circumstances of the project that would involve new significant environmental effects or a <br />substantial increase in environmental effects. This Order will require actions to protect water <br />quality as compared to Resolution No. R5-2003-0105. These actions include development, <br />implementation of management practices, and implementation of Management Plans as <br />requested by the Executive Officer and enhanced reporting and communications with regard <br />to exceedances of applicable water quality standards. <br />60. Since the adoption of Resolution No. R5-2003-0105 and the Negative Declaration, new <br />information has become available to the lead agency. Central Valley Water Board staff has <br />compiled two years of water quality monitoring data from Central Valley Water Board <br />sources, Coalition Groups, Water Districts and others within the Sacramento River, San <br />Joaquin River, and Tulare Lake Basins. Additional information has been provided by <br />contract with the University of California (UC). Water quality monitoring data from <br />Coalition Groups and Individual Dischargers identified exceedances of applicable water <br />quality standards. Monitoring conducted through a contract with the University of California <br />and monitoring from Coalition Groups and individual dischargers have identified problem <br />sites in many water bodies since 2004. Information from about 110 monitoring sites through <br />UC monitoring, about 90 monitoring sites from Coalitions, and 24 monitoring sites with <br />Irrigation Districts is providing data that will prove invaluable in characterizing the effects of <br />irrigated agriculture on water bodies in the Central Valley. About 1,758 samples were <br />collected by all of the Irrigated Lands Coalitions, and approximately 739 through the UC <br />contract. <br />Coalition monitoring consisted primarily of toxicity testing (Phase n and represents <br />approximately 20 percent of the water bodies within most individual coalition boundaries at <br />this time. Coalitions are required to expand their monitoring sites each year to be able to <br />assess all water bodies within their boundaries, as well as to expand into Phase II monitoring <br />which will include pesticides, nutrients and general water quality parameters. <br />