Laserfiche WebLink
RECEIVED <br /> SEP 2 9 2016 <br /> 7. <br /> 8. TANK ANNULAR TESTING <br /> Test Method Developed By: [I Tank Manufacturer N Industry Standard ElNal <br /> PMUIRfliMENTAL H TH <br /> ❑ Other(specify) DEPARTMENT <br /> Test Method Used: ❑Pressure N Vacuum ❑Hydrostatic <br /> ❑Other(Spec) <br /> Test Equipment Used:VACUUM GAUGE Equipment Resolution: 0.5" <br /> Tank#OCT. 100 Tank#91 Tank#87 Tank#DSL <br /> Is Tank Exempt From Testing?' ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes N No <br /> Tank Capacity: <br /> Tank Material: FG FG FG FG <br /> Tank Manufacturer: UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN <br /> Product Stored: OCT. 100 GAS GAS DSL <br /> Wait time between applying <br /> pressure/vacuum/water and 5 MIN 5 MIN 5 MIN 5 MIN <br /> starting test: <br /> Test Start Time: 10:00 10:00 10:00 11:30 <br /> Initial Reading(Ri): -10" -10" -10" -10" <br /> Test End Time: 11:00 11:00 11:00 12:30 <br /> Final Reading(RF): -10" -10" -10" -10" <br /> Test Duration: 1 HR 1 HR IHR IRR <br /> Change in Reading(RF-Ri): 0 0 0 0 <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0 0 0 0 <br /> Test Result: N Pass ❑Fail N Pass ❑Fail N Pass ❑ Fail N Pass ❑Fail <br /> Was sensor removed for testing? rM <br /> Yes❑No❑NA N Yes❑No❑NA N Yes❑No❑NA N Yes❑No❑NA <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and Yes❑No❑NA N Yes❑No❑NA N Yes❑No❑NA N Yes❑No❑NA <br /> verified functional after testin ? <br /> Comments—(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) <br /> ' Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br /> containment,such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment <br /> testing. {California Code of Regulations,Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)) <br /> Secondary Containment Test Results 3 of 15 <br />